Monkey Hunter demonstration in GR

  • Thread starter Thread starter flatmaster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Demonstration Gr
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of General Relativity (GR) on the classic Monkey Hunter demonstration, where a projectile is aimed at a monkey dropping from a branch. The participants explore how the uniform gravitational field assumption changes under GR, particularly when considering scenarios near a black hole's event horizon. They conclude that while simultaneity can be defined for closely positioned objects, both the bullet and the monkey would ultimately fall into the singularity if fired from outside the event horizon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with gravitational fields and their effects on motion
  • Knowledge of event horizons and singularities in black holes
  • Basic concepts of projectile motion and simultaneity in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of General Relativity on projectile motion
  • Study the concept of simultaneity in different gravitational fields
  • Explore the physics of black holes, focusing on event horizons and singularities
  • Investigate experimental setups that test GR predictions in strong gravitational fields
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the intersection of classical mechanics and General Relativity.

flatmaster
Messages
497
Reaction score
2
I'm not sure if this has been discussed before.

We all know about the Monkey Hunter Demonstration. Assuming a uniform gravitational field, a projectile shot directly at a target will strike the target as long as the target has zero velocity at t=0 and both the projectile and target begin to accelerate under gravity at t=0. Of course, the physical demonstration is a hunter shooting a monkey with the monkey dropping from the branch the instant the gun is fired. I think we worked through the math in undergrad.

My question is how would this thought experiment change within GR?

Also, Would this experiment be possible? Is there any place close enough to the GR - classical barrier that has a huge, but classically uniform value for g over the three spatial coordinates? Is there a place where you can say F = mg*yhat with a large value for g?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you propose to define "directly"?

(And will you be symmetric in applying the "uniform" requirement?)
 
Last edited:
Totally cool question!

cesiumfrog said:
How do you propose to define "directly"?
Seems to me that the only sensible way to define "directly" is that the gun has a laser sight, and the laser sight is making a red dot on the monkey's chest.

Suppose the gun is located outside the event horizon of a black hole, at a radius the permits circular orbits for rays of light. Then the monkey could actually be right *behind* the gun, but the laser sight would be hitting the monkey in the chest.

Now you run into a problem with defining the notion of dropping the monkey simultaneously with the firing of the gun. But GR does allow simultaneity to be well defined for spatial positions that are close to one another, and the monkey is close to the gun -- it's right behind the gun.

So you fire the gun and drop the monkey behind it simultaneously. Clearly the monkey will disappear below the event horizon very quickly, and so will the bullet.

Well, the bullet is certainly going to hit the monkey, because they will both impact on the singularity.
 
Save the monkeys! :-p
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K