penguin007
- 75
- 0
What's the formula for the amplitude of a photon?
Thanks.
Thanks.
The discussion revolves around the concept of the amplitude of a photon, particularly in the context of quantum mechanics and probability amplitudes. Participants explore the mathematical expressions related to the probability of a photon transitioning between two points in space over time, touching on concepts from quantum electrodynamics (QED) and path integrals.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the definition and implications of the amplitude of a photon, with multiple competing views and interpretations remaining throughout the discussion.
Some participants note the importance of providing clear context for questions, indicating that assumptions about the nature of photon travel and the mathematical framework may not be universally understood. There are also references to the complexities of photon behavior that may not be fully resolved in the discussion.
penguin007 said:What's the formula for the amplitude of a photon?
:What do you mean by the "amplitude of a photon?"
penguin007 said:I mean the amplitude of probability that has a photon in A at T1 to appear in B at T2.
penguin007 said:Then I should provide a clear context to my question:
By “amplitude of a photon”, I mean the amplitude of probability for a photon situated in a point A of the space A(xA,yA,zA) at t=T1 to appear in an other point B(xB,yB,zB) at t=T2.
Indeed, I read (QED: The strange theory of light and matter) that we could not consider that a photon traveled in a straight line and therefore, we must consider all the potential ways the photon could take.
Besides, a photon has also amplitudes to travel faster or lower than the speed c. These amplitudes reduce each other to zero in long distances, but they must be taken in consideration for short distances.
I guess this problem is in relation with path integrals, but I also read that the amplitude of a photon had a simple expression that depends on (xA-xB)^2, (yA-yB)^2,(zA-zB)^2 and (T1-T2)^2: I’m looking for this expression.
Thanks for your help.