John Baez's comments on CDT/Hořava-Lifshitz gravity.

  • Thread starter Thread starter MTd2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
MTd2
Gold Member
Messages
2,019
Reaction score
25
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3352208#post3352208

****************************

The abstract of the new Sotiriou-Visser-Weinfurtner paper sounds pretty explosive:

MTd2 said:
We explore the ultraviolet continuum regime of causal dynamical triangulations, as probed by the flow of the spectral dimension. We set up a framework in which one can find continuum theories that can fully reproduce the behaviour of the latter in this regime. In particular, we show that Hořava-Lifgarbagez gravity can mimic the flow of the spectral dimension in causal dynamical triangulations to high accuracy and over a wide range of scales. This seems to indicate that the two theories lie in the same universality class.
Because causal dynamical triangulations slices up spacetime into surfaces of "constant time", I'd always worried that it was quantizing not general relativity but some other theory - one that has a built-in separation between time and space. Hořava-Lifgarbagez gravity is such a theory. Wikipedia writes:

Hořava-Lifgarbagez gravity (or Hořava gravity) is a theory of quantum gravity proposed by Petr Hořava in 2009. It solves the problem of different concepts of time in quantum field theory and general relativity by treating the quantum concept as the more fundamental so that space and time are not equivalent (anisotropic). The relativistic concept of time with its Lorentz invariance emerges at large distances. The theory relies on the theory of foliations to produce its causal structure. It is related to topologically massive gravity and the Cotton tensor. It is a possible UV completion of general relativity. The novelty of this approach, compared to previous approaches to quantum gravity such as Loop quantum gravity, is that it uses concepts from condensed matter physics such as quantum critical phenomena.

Hořava's initial formulation was found to have side-effects such as predicting very different results for a spherical Sun compared to a slightly non-spherical Sun, so others have modified the theory. Inconsistencies remain.
How are the causal dynamical triangulations people reacting to the work of Sotiriou, Visser, and Weinfurtner? Do they agree that they may be quantizing Hořava-Lifgarbagez gravity?

I haven't been paying attention to this stuff, but I may find out the answer to this question when I go to Zurich tonight. I guess both Ambjorn and Loll will be there.

By the way, your posts listing these abstracts serve as a nice quick way to catch up on recent work in quantum gravity. Thanks! I don't want to seem like I'm completely out of the loop.

Hmm, here's what Ambjorn and Loll say in their new review article:

What is curious about the phase structure of four-dimensional CDT quantum gravity is its resemblance with that of Horava-Lifgarbagez gravity [17], which has been spelled out further in [18,19]. It gives rise to the intriguing conjecture that there may be a universal phase diagram governing systems of higher-dimensional, dynamical geometry, and accomodating a variety of gravity theories, some of which may be anisotropic in space and time.

To someone raised on relativity it would seem a painful step to admit one is quantizing a theory where there really is a single "right" notion of time, and Lorentz transformations are just a kind of approximate symmetry, good at macroscopic scales. Maybe they hope they can get at quantum general relativity as one point in the phase diagram of Horava-Lifgarbagez theories.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like there's lots of interesting stuff in Horava-Lifgarbagez still.

marcus has just listed a new paper from http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.2131" about Horava-Lifgarbagez in his biblioraphy.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.0009" .

According to Visser, Horava-Lifgarbagez is still http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.5587" .

Now, can someone tell me why http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.3094" working on AdS/CFT cite Gu and Wen?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.3298" that draws a connection between noncritical strings in 2D and CDT...

Seems like everything's connected!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
this thread is to open up discussion on Gravi-GUT as theories of everything GUT or Grand Unified Theories attempt to unify the 3 forces of weak E&M and strong force, and Gravi-GUT want to add gravity. this peer reviewed paper in a journal on Gravi-GUT Chirality in unified theories of gravity F. Nesti1 and R. Percacci2 Phys. Rev. D 81, 025010 – Published 14 January, 2010 published by Physical Review D this paper is cited by another more recent Gravi-GUT these papers and research...
In post #549 here I answered: And then I was surprised by the comment of Tom, asking how the pairing was done. Well, I thought that I had discussed it in some thread in BSM, but after looking at it, it seems that I did only a few sparse remarks here and there. On other hand, people was not liking to interrupt the flow of the thread and I have been either contacted privately or suggested to open a new thread. So here it is. The development can be traced in some draft papers...
Back
Top