John Baez's comments on CDT/Hořava-Lifshitz gravity.

  • Thread starter Thread starter MTd2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of the Sotiriou-Visser-Weinfurtner paper, which suggests that Hořava-Lifgarbagez gravity can closely mimic the spectral dimension flow observed in causal dynamical triangulations (CDT). This finding raises the possibility that both theories may belong to the same universality class, despite concerns that CDT might not be quantizing general relativity. The authors of the paper and other researchers, like Ambjorn and Loll, note similarities in the phase structure of CDT and Hořava-Lifgarbagez gravity, hinting at a universal phase diagram for various gravity theories. There is ongoing debate about the implications of quantizing a theory that treats time and space differently, which challenges traditional views rooted in relativity. Overall, the conversation highlights the interconnectedness of recent developments in quantum gravity research.
MTd2
Gold Member
Messages
2,019
Reaction score
25
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3352208#post3352208

****************************

The abstract of the new Sotiriou-Visser-Weinfurtner paper sounds pretty explosive:

MTd2 said:
We explore the ultraviolet continuum regime of causal dynamical triangulations, as probed by the flow of the spectral dimension. We set up a framework in which one can find continuum theories that can fully reproduce the behaviour of the latter in this regime. In particular, we show that Hořava-Lifgarbagez gravity can mimic the flow of the spectral dimension in causal dynamical triangulations to high accuracy and over a wide range of scales. This seems to indicate that the two theories lie in the same universality class.
Because causal dynamical triangulations slices up spacetime into surfaces of "constant time", I'd always worried that it was quantizing not general relativity but some other theory - one that has a built-in separation between time and space. Hořava-Lifgarbagez gravity is such a theory. Wikipedia writes:

Hořava-Lifgarbagez gravity (or Hořava gravity) is a theory of quantum gravity proposed by Petr Hořava in 2009. It solves the problem of different concepts of time in quantum field theory and general relativity by treating the quantum concept as the more fundamental so that space and time are not equivalent (anisotropic). The relativistic concept of time with its Lorentz invariance emerges at large distances. The theory relies on the theory of foliations to produce its causal structure. It is related to topologically massive gravity and the Cotton tensor. It is a possible UV completion of general relativity. The novelty of this approach, compared to previous approaches to quantum gravity such as Loop quantum gravity, is that it uses concepts from condensed matter physics such as quantum critical phenomena.

Hořava's initial formulation was found to have side-effects such as predicting very different results for a spherical Sun compared to a slightly non-spherical Sun, so others have modified the theory. Inconsistencies remain.
How are the causal dynamical triangulations people reacting to the work of Sotiriou, Visser, and Weinfurtner? Do they agree that they may be quantizing Hořava-Lifgarbagez gravity?

I haven't been paying attention to this stuff, but I may find out the answer to this question when I go to Zurich tonight. I guess both Ambjorn and Loll will be there.

By the way, your posts listing these abstracts serve as a nice quick way to catch up on recent work in quantum gravity. Thanks! I don't want to seem like I'm completely out of the loop.

Hmm, here's what Ambjorn and Loll say in their new review article:

What is curious about the phase structure of four-dimensional CDT quantum gravity is its resemblance with that of Horava-Lifgarbagez gravity [17], which has been spelled out further in [18,19]. It gives rise to the intriguing conjecture that there may be a universal phase diagram governing systems of higher-dimensional, dynamical geometry, and accomodating a variety of gravity theories, some of which may be anisotropic in space and time.

To someone raised on relativity it would seem a painful step to admit one is quantizing a theory where there really is a single "right" notion of time, and Lorentz transformations are just a kind of approximate symmetry, good at macroscopic scales. Maybe they hope they can get at quantum general relativity as one point in the phase diagram of Horava-Lifgarbagez theories.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like there's lots of interesting stuff in Horava-Lifgarbagez still.

marcus has just listed a new paper from http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.2131" about Horava-Lifgarbagez in his biblioraphy.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.0009" .

According to Visser, Horava-Lifgarbagez is still http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.5587" .

Now, can someone tell me why http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.3094" working on AdS/CFT cite Gu and Wen?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.3298" that draws a connection between noncritical strings in 2D and CDT...

Seems like everything's connected!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K