Statics Mechanics: Looking for the flaw in my logic

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a statics problem involving a pulley system with a weight of 50 kg. The original poster is attempting to determine the force P required to hold the system in equilibrium, while also questioning the logic behind their calculations which resulted in a negative value.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the assumption that all cables exert the same tensional force, with some noting the presence of multiple cables and their individual tensions. Questions arise regarding the configuration of the cables and pulleys, as well as the implications of different setups on the forces involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring various interpretations of the pulley system. Some have provided insights into the mechanics of the setup, while others have raised questions about the forces acting on the pulleys and the overall equilibrium of the system. There is a recognition of the complexity introduced by different configurations of cables.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework problem, with some expressing uncertainty about the assumptions made regarding the pulley system and the connections between cables and pulleys. There is also mention of a lack of prior exposure to similar problems in their studies.

Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
Yep...back to old statics. Not because I have a test (already passed it in flying colours) just for fun seeing what I can solve and can't...now I ran into this:

Homework Statement


http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/1533/pulleyf.jpg

Statics:

The weight is 50kg. Find force P to hold it in equilibrium.

The Attempt at a Solution


http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/5787/pulleya.jpg Somehow I got the result in minus, trying to find where is the logic in this. Or, otherwise, where is the flaw in my logic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Fp! :smile:

Only saw this thread just now.

Weren't you giving lessons in mechanics nowadays?

Anyway, you are assuming that all cables give the same tensional force.
They don't.
It's not all the same cable.
There are 3 cables, each with its own tensional force.
 
I am giving lessons in mechanics, but with a very focused set of materials that I'm well-practiced with. In our course we never gone through several cables connected to system of pulleys. In fact, we hardly gave pulleys much time. At most we had one cable if I recall correctly.

Where do you see 3 cables?
 
And I just solved 2 more such exercises correctly. Don't make me prove myself :) Just needed to understand one "Graphical" principle!
 
Very good! You are :cool:

ehild
 
Good!

If you feel up to the challenge... what would happen if there was indeed 1 cable and holes in the pulleys?
 
Well then P would equal 1/6 of the weight. :)
 
Femme_physics said:
Well then P would equal 1/6 of the weight. :)

Suppose P would equal 1/6 of the weight, what would be the resultant force on the leftmost pulley?
 
  • #10
I like Serena said:
Suppose P would equal 1/6 of the weight, what would be the resultant force on the leftmost pulley?

2/6 of the weight
 
  • #11
Femme_physics said:
2/6 of the weight

That would mean that ƩFy is not zero... what would that mean?
 
  • #12
I like Serena said:
That would mean that ƩFy is not zero... what would that mean?

Of course ƩFy is zero. The resultant force at Y of the rightest pulley is 2/6... Of the middle pulley is also 2/6...and the right 2/6... these are the up vectors in the Y direction...the down vector is just the weight...so of course it ends up being ƩFy=0
 
  • #13
Femme_physics said:
Of course ƩFy is zero. The resultant force at Y of the rightest pulley is 2/6... Of the middle pulley is also 2/6...and the right 2/6... these are the up vectors in the Y direction...the down vector is just the weight...so of course it ends up being ƩFy=0

Which up vectors do you mean?

I see only 2 downward tensional forces on each pulley and the pulleys are not attached to anything else (since we assumed that the cables were not attached to the pulleys).
 
  • #15
Femme_physics said:
Each pulley has two!

Ah, I meant that I didn't see any up vectors on for instance pulley A.
 
  • #16
Wait a second...That was a trick question! If there are no pins attaching the pulleys to the rope they're going to slide down!
 
  • #17
Femme_physics said:
Wait a second...That was a trick question! If there are no pins attaching the pulleys to the rope they're going to slide down!

Yep. The whole thing would collapse! :eek:
 
  • #18
:) Thanks for the stimulation!
 
  • #19
Femme_physics said:
:) Thanks for the stimulation!

I'm just thinking of those poor cardboard men that were standing below that weight! :bugeye: :wink:
 
  • #20
LOL! Remeber them eh? :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K