How Will Lower Liquid Helium Costs Impact Superconductor Development?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gapgirl1010
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Temperature
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent reduction in liquid helium costs due to new storage technologies significantly impacts superconductor development. Liquid helium, which cools superconductors to 3 K, is now more accessible compared to liquid nitrogen, which cools to 77 K. While both liquids serve to cool superconductors, the cost-effectiveness of liquid nitrogen makes it a preferred choice for many researchers. The focus is shifting towards developing superconductors that can operate efficiently at higher temperatures, reducing the reliance on liquid helium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of superconductivity and critical temperature
  • Knowledge of thermodynamic principles, particularly boiling points
  • Familiarity with liquid helium and liquid nitrogen properties
  • Basic concepts of cryogenics and temperature scales (Kelvin, Celsius)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in high-temperature superconductors
  • Explore the latest technologies in liquid helium storage
  • Investigate the economic implications of using liquid nitrogen in superconductivity
  • Learn about the cooling methods for superconductors and their efficiency
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and engineers involved in superconductor technology, cryogenics, and materials science will benefit from this discussion.

gapgirl1010
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Liquid Nitrogen vs. Liquid Helium

The reason that liquid nitrogen temperature superconductors are important is that liquid nitrogen costs less than liquid helium. New technologies to store liquid helium have been developed in the last year. This has brought the cost of liquid helium down. how might this affect the direction of the field?

PLease help me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, the absolute zero is -173 right?

This is equal to 0 Kalvins right?
So which is a better superconducter?
Liquid Helium @ 3 K
Liquid Nitrogen @ 77K

PLease HelP!
 
The unit is called Kelvin, and absolute zero is 0 Kelvin or -273 degrees celsius.
 
Absolute zero is characterised as 0 kelvins or 0 degrees Rankine, −273.15 °C, −459.67 °F.
i'm not a chemist, but i bash chemists for their incompetence.
I would suppose liquid nitrogen...
 
gapgirl1010 said:
Hi, the absolute zero is -173 right?

This is equal to 0 Kalvins right?
So which is a better superconducter?
Liquid Helium @ 3 K
Liquid Nitrogen @ 77K

PLease HelP!

It's -273.15 degrees celsius. celsius to kelvin is an easy conversion since 1 degree celsius is the same as one kelvin, so T(kelvin) = T(celsius) + 273.15 degrees.

Understand first that Helium and Nitrogen aren't superconductors. They're used to cool the superconductors. Once you drop the temperature of the superconductive substance low enough, the internal resistance drops to near zero (it becomes a superconductor.) As far as what's going on with the superconductive material, they're both going to behave the same way once they reach the critical temperature.

The main difference is going to be cost. With it's higher boiling point, liquid nitrogen is *much* cheaper than liquid helium. The superconductor with the higher critical temperature will be more attractive from that perspective.
 
OKay, I get that thanks!
 
Well, first look at the boiling point of each liquid. Nitrogen condenses at 77 K while Helium condenses at 4.22 K.
It becomes increasingly expensive to cool something down. The closer to absolute zero (0K) something is cooled, the more it will cost.
Now, I believe that most superconductors must be chilled down below roughly 60 K. Most of the research today has been focusing on creating superconductors that can be cooled by Nitrogen.
Given this information and the information you already stated, how do you think the direction of the field will be affected?
~Steve
 
Last edited:
I have merged the 2 He/Hy threads, one is enough.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K