Population III detected at last?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Garth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    population
AI Thread Summary
The recent identification of a gamma-ray burst (GRB) associated with a hypernova at redshift z = 6.295 may indicate the first detection of Population III stars, which are believed to have contributed to the universe's 'first light.' However, the mass of 20 solar masses mentioned in the article remains uncertain, raising questions about its accuracy. Observations at such high redshifts should be approached with caution until further confirmation is obtained. The presence of heavy elements around the progenitor star suggests it may not be a true Population III star, as these stars are expected to form in metal-poor environments. Overall, while the findings are intriguing, they require careful interpretation and validation.
Garth
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
3,580
Reaction score
107
Is the identification of a GRB with a 'hyper-nova' at z = 6.295 when the universe was 900 Myrs old (standard model) the first detection of the long awaited Population III stars that caused the 'first light'?Ancient blast comes to light

That article speaks of a mass of 20MSolar, but I don't know whether that is a determined or 'guessitmated' value.

Garth
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Garth said:
Is the identification of a GRB with a 'hyper-nova' at z = 6.295 when the universe was 900 Myrs old (standard model) the first detection of the long awaited Population III stars that caused the 'first light'?Ancient blast comes to light

That article speaks of a mass of 20MSolar, but I don't know whether that is a determined or 'guessitmated' value.

Garth
An observation that should be viewed with utmost caustion, until some
confirmation is forthcomming.
 
as should any observation at z=6.295!
 
Cusumano, G. et al. Nature 440, 164 (2006).
Kawai, N. et al. Nature 440, 184–186 (2006).
Letter
Nature 440, 184-186 (9 March 2006) | doi:10.1038/nature04498

An optical spectrum of the afterglow of a -ray burst at a redshift of z = 6.295
N. Kawai1, G. Kosugi2, K. Aoki3, T. Yamada2, T. Totani4, K. Ohta4, M. Iye2, T. Hattori3, W. Aoki2, H. Furusawa3, K. Hurley5, K. S. Kawabata6, N. Kobayashi7, Y. Komiyama3, Y. Mizumoto2, K. Nomoto8, J. Noumaru3, R. Ogasawara2, R. Sato1, K. Sekiguchi3, Y. Shirasaki2, M. Suzuki9, T. Takata2, T. Tamagawa9, H. Terada3, J. Watanabe2, Y. Yatsu1 and A. Yoshida10

The prompt -ray emission from \gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) should be detectable out to distances of z > 10 (ref. 1), and should therefore provide an excellent probe of the evolution of cosmic star formation, reionization of the intergalactic medium, and the metal enrichment history of the Universe1, 2, 3, 4. Hitherto, the highest measured redshift for a GRB has been z = 4.50 (ref. 5). Here we report the optical spectrum of the afterglow of GRB 050904 obtained 3.4 days after the burst; the spectrum shows a clear continuum at the long-wavelength end of the spectrum with a sharp cut-off at around 9,000 Å due to Lyman absorption at z 6.3 (with a damping wing). A system of absorption lines of heavy elements at z = 6.295 0.002 was also detected, yielding the precise measurement of the redshift. The Si ii fine-structure lines suggest a dense, metal-enriched environment around the progenitor of the GRB.

Haislip, J. B. et al. Nature 440, 181–183 (2006).
Letter
Nature 440, 181-183 (9 March 2006) | doi:10.1038/nature04552

A photometric redshift of z = 6.39 0.12 for GRB 050904
J. B. Haislip1, M. C. Nysewander1, D. E. Reichart1, A. Levan2, N. Tanvir2, S. B. Cenko3, D. B. Fox4, P. A. Price5, A. J. Castro-Tirado6, J. Gorosabel6, C. R. Evans1, E. Figueredo7,8, C. L. MacLeod1, J. R. Kirschbrown1, M. Jelinek6, S. Guziy6, A. de Ugarte Postigo6, E. S. Cypriano8,9, A. LaCluyze1, J. Graham10, R. Priddey2, R. Chapman2, J. Rhoads11, A. S. Fruchter11, D. Q. Lamb12, C. Kouveliotou13, R. A. M. J. Wijers14, M. B. Bayliss1,12, B. P. Schmidt15, A. M. Soderberg3, S. R. Kulkarni3, F. A. Harrison16, D. S. Moon3, A. Gal-Yam3, M. M. Kasliwal3, R. Hudec17, S. Vitek18, P. Kubanek19, J. A. Crain1, A. C. Foster1, J. C. Clemens1, J. W. Bartelme1, R. Canterna20, D. H. Hartmann21, A. A. Henden22, S. Klose23, H.-S. Park24, G. G. Williams25, E. Rol26, P. O'Brien26, D. Bersier27, F. Prada6, S. Pizarro8, D. Maturana8, P. Ugarte8, A. Alvarez8, A. J. M. Fernandez6, M. J. Jarvis28, M. Moles6, E. Alfaro6, K. M. Ivarsen1, N. D. Kumar1, C. E. Mack1, C. M. Zdarowicz1, N. Gehrels29, S. Barthelmy29 and D. N. Burrows4

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and their afterglows are the most brilliant transient events in the Universe. Both the bursts themselves and their afterglows have been predicted to be visible out to redshifts of z ~ 20, and therefore to be powerful probes of the early Universe1, 2. The burst GRB 000131, at z = 4.50, was hitherto the most distant such event identified3. Here we report the discovery of the bright near-infrared afterglow of GRB 050904 (ref. 4). From our measurements of the near-infrared afterglow, and our failure to detect the optical afterglow, we determine the photometric redshift of the burst to be (refs 5–7). Subsequently, it was measured8 spectroscopically to be z = 6.29 +/- 0.01, in agreement with our photometric estimate. These results demonstrate that GRBs can be used to trace the star formation, metallicity, and reionization histories of the early Universe.

Hmm. Quite a lot of collaboration and three independent observations.

Garth
 
The metal enriched environment thing makes me doubt the examples given are pop III stars. A cart before the horse thing.
 
Chronos said:
The metal enriched environment thing makes me doubt the examples given are pop III stars. A cart before the horse thing.
Well, z = 6.295 would be a late PopIII star, formed in an already metal rich environment, even then metals would have been produced by the star itself during its own lifetime.

The suggestion, put as a question, that this early super/hyper-nova should be identified with a PopIII star is actually mine, made in the title of this thread.

Garth
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top