Can string theory make predictions for particle physics?

Click For Summary
String theory presents challenges in making predictions for particle physics due to the vast number of possible solutions, with estimates of vacua potentially exceeding 10^600. Washington Taylor from MIT discussed the systematic analysis of gauge groups and generation numbers in quasi-realistic intersecting brane models, suggesting that the number of vacua may continue to grow indefinitely. Despite finding no correlations in his specific analysis of the standard model parameters, he remains optimistic about future predictions emerging from string theory. The lecture attracted significant interest, highlighting the ongoing engagement in the field. The discussion also touched on the controversial nature of the term "anthropic" in string theory circles.
CarlB
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,246
Reaction score
45
I attended a string theory lecture this afternoon at the Joint Particle Physics 2006 meeting in Hawaii. One of the string theory parallel lectures caught my eye:

Can string theory make predictions for particle physics?
Washington Taylor, MIT
The appearance in string theory of a wide range of solutions corresponding to low-energy field theories with different gauge groups and matter content poses a challenge to string theorists who wish to make predictions for particle physics. This talk presents a summary of the state of our knowledge regarding the space of string vacua, and describes recent work in which the gauge groups and generation numbers of a set of quasi-realistic intersecting brane models are systematically analyzed.
http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/indico/contributionDisplay.py?contribId=96&sessionId=168&confId=3

He made the point that early estimates that the number of vacua were about 10^{600} are probably very deep underestimates. He proposed a "Moore's Law" for the landscape, implying that the number of vacua were going to keep increasing indefinitely.

Despite this, Dr. Taylor expressed hope that there would eventually be a prediction come out of string theory. His idea was that there would pop up correlations between various parameters of the standard model. However, in his own explorations which counted how many vacua would have SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1) and 3 generations in a tiny corner of the landscape, he had found that there were no correlations. He was asked about this in the question and answer session and said that he still had hopes because he hadn't looked at all the other parameters of the standard model such as the masses of the particles. (Should have attended my lecture, I guess.)

The lecture was well attended with about 150 people, standing room only.

Carl
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CarlB said:
He made the point that early estimates that the number of vacua were about 10^{600} are probably very deep underestimates.

ROTFLOL :smile: :smile:
 
More color from the string theory talk:

After the talk, one of the questioners started out her query with "I noticed that you avoided using the "A" word ..."

Of course my mind leapt to the possibilities. Antimatter? Axion? Anomaly? Asymmetry? Atheism? Astronomy? Angular momentum? Algebra? Accuracy? Adultery? Ab initio? Aardvark?

Apparently the locals knew what was being talked about and the author, dared by the questioner, used the word "anthropic" in his response. I guess that that's a bit of a dirty word among the stringers.

Carl
 
What Kea said! :rolleyes: :wink:
 
CarlB said:
Despite this, Dr. Taylor expressed hope that there would eventually be a prediction come out of string theory.

Wow :smile: :biggrin:
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
18K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K