Untrained Physicist Seeking Feedback on Written Theory - Tips and Advice"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kratz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stupid Theories
AI Thread Summary
To get a theory evaluated by trained physicists, it's essential to present it clearly, ideally in one or two pages. While mathematical formulation is crucial for serious consideration, a well-articulated written explanation can also be a starting point. Engaging with local university professors or graduate students can provide valuable feedback. Posting in specialized forums, like the Independent Research section, is another option, though it requires adherence to specific guidelines. It's important to be aware of existing literature in the field to avoid redundancy and ensure the theory is original. Building a solid foundation in physics through education is recommended before developing and sharing theories, as this will enhance credibility and understanding.
Kratz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone.

How does one get a theory "out"? Let's say I have theory, but I'm not a trained physicist. I can't write out my theory as a mathematical equation. I can simply put it in words. How can I get someone trained in physics to look at it and tell me whether I'm smoking crack, simply delusional, or possibly onto something?

I'm completely new to this, and have no idea what one should do to get someone to look at a simple written theory.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it can be written clearly in one or two pages, a professor at a local university would probably be willing to look it over. Or you could post it here- on the "Independent Reasarch" forum.
 
If your theory has no equations, chances are(almost positively) it is more of a philosophy paper than a physics paper. If you are genuinely interested in this stuff, I suggest you educate yourself over the course of a couple of years, or go to university.

I'm not saying your theory is wrong, just that it won't be taken seriously if there is no math behind it.
 
Science requires proof, that's what makes it beautiful :).
 
it would be possible to illustrate the concept without equations and a formal education, but you would have to find very simple yet powerful examples, like the relativity example of the I-beam flying by a moving observer and an observer staying still.

if you were to write a good paper outlining your theory and sent it to a professor who could help you with the finer details, i think that would work
 
yeah but things like the I beam example in SR come after the basic theory is created,

I think your best option would be t write it down and file it away in your computer and work towards a physics degree, 4-5 years from now you can look back on it and see if it still makes sense.
 
juist tell it to anyone knowledgeable and see if they say: "what %%$@***&&HIt"

or post it here. there is an amazing number of people here willing toa ctually look at %%$@@(()&*^^!hit theories and comment on them.
 
Hello!

I have got a question first. Have you been choosing the terms 'theory' distinctively. Cause no one of those of whom seriously have come to some kind of clue will express a theory not as words and never as a mathematical equation. They had have had to think it over as it was a thought indeed worth the effort to inform others about, which get's harder and harder as the issue(s ) getting more complex. As for my experience, at the end there will not be no one providing any help. So you'll know you're right.

I'm not wanting you to stop whatever you're doing but providing serious help.

Thank's
Steve
 
Last edited:
mathwonk said:
or post it here.
That's really not an option - it would be in violation of the posting guidelines.

The only place in PF for a personal theory is the Independent Research forum, and the theory will have to be formatted to the posting constraints mentioned there.

Better yet, find your way up to the nearest physics department, grab a grad student heading out to get lunch, offer to buy his lunch for him, and have him look at your theory.

Finally, I'd recommend you do not spend time developing theories until you are completely aware of all the existing literature in the area of your theory. In the very best case, someone may have already published exactly what you want to say. How would you know unless you are fully informed on the published literature?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
That's really not an option - it would be in violation of the posting guidelines.

or he can just make a post in general physics entitled "Does this make sense?"

Really, we should control the rules, the rules shouldn't control us. If it's impossible to make a valid post inquiring about physics because of over-restrictive rules, it means they need to be scrapped
 
  • #11
yeah... even though I'm sure a lot of us here would love to read it, some of the moderators might meet it with some hostility and deem it homegrown crackpottery so i would recommend against that until you have more written support

however, there's nothing wrong with putting it somewhere else and hinting in a thread that we should look at it ;]
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
498
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
960
Back
Top