Adam
- 65
- 1
A simple question. Do you think nations can afford to fight wars (not including wars of defence) out of altruism? Yes or no?
The discussion revolves around whether nations can afford to engage in wars driven by altruism, excluding defensive conflicts. Participants explore the definitions and implications of altruism in the context of warfare, questioning the motivations behind such actions.
Participants express differing views on the existence of altruism and its role in warfare, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without consensus.
The discussion highlights the complexity of defining altruism and its implications for understanding the motivations behind wars, suggesting that assumptions about these concepts may vary among participants.
The question may be simple, but the answer is extrordinarily complex. One might argue (for example), that there is no such thing as altruism. Even seemingly altruistic actions will have personal consequences.Adam said:A simple question.
Adam said:If one argued that there is no such thing as altruism, that one must be saying that the USA does not go to war for altruism. Simple.