Show wave kinetic energy and potential energy are the same

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the kinetic and potential energies of a traveling wave on a string are equal. The original poster presents equations for both energies and seeks clarification on the integration of second-order partial derivatives to establish this equality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to integrate the second-order partial derivatives of the wave function to show the equality of kinetic and potential energies. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of first and second derivatives in the context of the energy equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct interpretation of derivatives and the integration process. The original poster appears to be making progress in their calculations and is encouraged to continue exploring the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on showing work before receiving assistance, and participants are navigating the constraints of homework rules while seeking clarification on specific mathematical expressions.

JayKo
Messages
127
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a traveling wave y=f(x-vt) on a string. Show that the kinetic and potential energies are always equal to each other. Remember that the potential energy of a wave on a string (over one wavelength) is given by

Homework Equations



E(potential)= 1/2 * F * \int (\partialy/\partialx)^2 dx
E(kinetic) = 1/2 * \mu * \int (\partialy/\partialt)^2 dx

F=\muv^2
ps:the integrand is integrate from 0 to lamba.
3. The Attempt at a Solution (\partial^{2}y/\partialt^{2})=-\omega^{2}A sin(\omegat-kx)

(\partial^{2}y/\partialx^{2})=-k^{2}A sin(\omegat-kx)

so my question is, is it i just need to integrate both the 2nd order partial derivative that i will be show that both potential and kinetic are the same? thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What work have you done on this problem so far?

Remember that you MUST show some work or thought on a problem before we can help you. We help people with homework problems. We do not do their homework for them.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=94379
 
hi G01, thanks for the prompt reply. i am typing my working now.
 
ok, just updated my question, hope some can answer my question.thanks :o

i m not asking for working, i just need clarification of my question. thanks.
 
JayKo said:

Homework Statement


Consider a traveling wave y=f(x-vt) on a string. Show that the kinetic and potential energies are always equal to each other. Remember that the potential energy of a wave on a string (over one wavelength) is given by

Homework Equations



E(potential)= 1/2 * F * \int (\partialy/\partialx)^2 dx
E(kinetic) = 1/2 * \mu * \int (\partialy/\partialt)^2 dx

F=\muv^2
ps:the integrand is integrate from 0 to lamba.
3. The Attempt at a Solution (\partial^{2}y/\partialt^{2})=-\omega^{2}A sin(\omegat-kx)

(\partial^{2}y/\partialx^{2})=-k^{2}A sin(\omegat-kx)

so my question is, is it i just need to integrate both the 2nd order partial derivative that i will be show that both potential and kinetic are the same? thanks.


Yes, your goal is to show that the potential energy integral and kinetic energy integral must be equal. Now, I just want to point out one possible error. In your relevant formulas for potential and kinetic energy, you have the expressions:

(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x})^2 and

(\frac{\partial y}{\partial t})^2

By these do you mean, "the second derivative" or "the first derivative squared?"
 
Last edited:
G01 said:
Yes, that is how I would go about this problem. Now, I just want to point out one possible error. In your relevant formulas for potential and kinetic energy, you have the expressions:

(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x})^2 and

(\frac{\partial y}{\partial t})^2

By these do you mean, "the second derivative" or "the first derivative squared?"

the question is written as (\frac{\partial y}{\partial x})^2 and

(\frac{\partial y}{\partial t})^2, actually that is my question, is first order partial derivative squared=second order partial derivative ?
 
Last edited:
JayKo said:
actually that is my question, is first partial derivative squared=second partial derivative ?

No, the two quantities are not generally equal to one another. So, you are going to want to work with first derivatives here and square them, since that is what each expression involves.
 
JayKo,

You seem to have a good idea of where you need to go with the problem at this point. I have to head out, but when I get home later I'll check back on this thread to see how you are doing. Try the calculations and see if you can show the equality. f you have any troubles post them, and I'll see if I can help later. Good Luck!
 
G01 said:
No, the two quantities are not generally equal to one another. So, you are going to want to work with first derivatives here and square them, since that is what each expression involves.
i see, got it now, in that case, i just substitute

(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x})^2=(k * A cos (omega*t-kx))^2

and the same for (\frac{\partial y}{\partial t})^2, with power of omega drop to 1. right? thanks
 
Last edited:
  • #10
G01 said:
JayKo,

You seem to have a good idea of where you need to go with the problem at this point. I have to head out, but when I get home later I'll check back on this thread to see how you are doing. Try the calculations and see if you can show the equality. f you have any troubles post them, and I'll see if I can help later. Good Luck!

Thanks G01, no problem. i guess we are of different time zone, here is 1:13 am 03 Feb 08.is time to go to bed. will work out this after wake up. thanks and appreciated your help. when you are free then check out my working here. thanks again.
 
  • #11
JayKo said:
i see, got it now, in that case, i just substitute

(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x})^2=(k * A cos (omega*t-kx))^2

and the same for (\frac{\partial y}{\partial t})^2, with power of omega drop to 1. right? thanks

Looks like you got the idea Jay. Good luck! If you have any more trouble feel free to ask.
 
  • #12
Hi G01, will show the working later. rushing with other assignment
 
  • #13
taking \partialy/\partialt=-\omegaA*cos(kx-\omegat)

\partialy/\partialx=kA*cos(kx-\omegat)

integrate from 0 to \lambda (\partialy/\partialt)^2=
\omega^{2}A^{2}\intcos^{2}(kx-\omegat)
=\omega^{2}A^{2}[x/2+(1/4(sin(2kx-2\omegat))]
=\omega^{2}A^{2}[\lambda/2+1/4(sin(2(2\pi\lambda/\lambda-2\omegat)+sin(2\omegat))]
=\omega^{2}A^{2}[\lambda/2+1/4(sin(4\pi-2\omegat)+sin(2\omegat))]
=\omega^{2}A^{2}[\lambda/2+1/4(-2\omegat)+sin(2\omegat))]
=\omega^{2}A^{2}[\lambda/2.
subst =\omega^{2}A^{2}[\lambda/2]. into

E(kinetic)
and get E = 1/4 *\mu \omega^{2}A^{2}[\lambda].do the same for E (potential)

integrate partial derivative of y/t from 0 to lamba will get k^{2}A^{2}[\lambda]/2

and subst it into E(potential) and subst F=\muv^2 to get 1/4 *\mu \omega^{2}A^{2}[\lambda][proved]oh boy oh boy, finally i got it. thanks G01 :D
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
55
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K