Commuting metric past Dirac spinors?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter auditor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dirac Metric Spinors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the transition from the expression for the scattering amplitude in Peskin & Schroeder, specifically from the equation at the bottom of page 131 to equation (5.1) at the top of page 132. The key point clarified is that the metric component \( g_{\mu\nu} \) is a numerical value that commutes with all operators, including Dirac spinors. This understanding resolves the confusion regarding the commutation of the metric with the spinors, affirming that the metric does not interfere with the mathematical operations involving the spinors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory (QFT) principles
  • Familiarity with Dirac spinors and their properties
  • Knowledge of the SU(2) group and its relevance in particle physics
  • Basic comprehension of scattering amplitudes and their calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of scattering amplitudes in Peskin & Schroeder, focusing on Chapter 5
  • Learn about the properties of Dirac spinors and their mathematical representations
  • Explore the role of the metric tensor in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the implications of SU(2) symmetry in particle interactions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those studying quantum field theory, graduate students in theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of particle interactions.

auditor
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering how in Peskin & Schroeder they go from

i\mathcal{M} = {\overline{v}^s^'} (p^{'}) (-ie\gamma^\mu)u^s(p) \left( \frac{-ig_{\mu\nu}}{q^2} \right) \overline{u}^r (k) (-ie\gamma^\nu) v^{r^{'}} (k)

at the bottom of page 131 to (5.1) at the top of 132 which reads

i\mathcal{M} = \frac{ie^2}{q^2}(\overline{v}(p^{'}) \gamma^\mu u(p) (\overline{u}(k)\gamma_\mu v(k^{'}))

Most of the stuff is ok, in particular dropping the spin superscripts. But how does the metric commute with

\overline{u}^r (k)

? I kind'a remember that the spinors are elements of the SU(2) group and that this might be related to my question. It seems as though the commutator is 0. But if I write out the metric and the Dirac spinor on matrix and vector form respectively I get a matrix product of the form

(4 x 4)\cdot (1 x 4)

which is undefined. I suspect by doing this I'm mixing apples and oranges, thus my reference to the SU(2) structure. I really don't have time to dwell in group theoretical details right now, although I'm aware that this is the only way to really get QFT. Could anyone please advice? My intuition is that, yes; they do commute, but I want to be sure.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're thinking too hard. :smile:

g_{\mu\nu} is not the metric, it is (for each \mu and \nu) a component of the metric, i.e., a number, and, as such, commutes with everything!
 
Wow - that's true. :) Thanks a lot George, really appreciate it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K