A Trace of a product of Dirac Matrices in a Fermion loop

44
0
I'm working out the quark loop diagram and I've drawn it as follows:

quark loop.jpg


where the greek letters are the Lorentz and Dirac indices for the gluon and quark respectively and the other letters are color indices.
For this diagram I've written:

$$i\Pi^{\mu\nu}=\int_{}^{}\frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4}.[ig(t_a)_{ij}\gamma^\mu].[\frac{i[(\not\! k-\frac{\not{q}}{2})+m_1]}{(k-\frac{q}{2})^2-m_1+i\epsilon}\delta_{il}].[ig(t_b)_{kl}\gamma^\nu].[\frac{i[(\not\! k+\frac{\not{q}}{2})+m_2]}{(k+\frac{q}{2})^2-m_2+i\epsilon}\delta_{kj}]$$

In Peskin & Schroeder's Introduction to QFT it is said: "a closed fermion loop always gives a factor of -1 and the trace of a product of Dirac matrices". In short, I can write the above expression as:

$$i\Pi^{\mu\nu}=g^2T_F\delta{ab}\int_{}^{}\frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{tr[\gamma^\mu.((\not\! k-\frac{\not{q}}{2})+m_1).\gamma^\nu.((\not\! k+\frac{\not{q}}{2})+m_2)]}{((k-\frac{q}{2})^2-m_1+i\epsilon).((k+\frac{q}{2})^2-m_2+i\epsilon)}$$

where ##T_F## is the Dynkin index in the fundamental representation I get after contracting the generators and deltas.
What I'm having a hard time with is on how to explicitly write the Dirac indices in each gamma matrix and slashed momenta in order to get something of the sort, e.g, ##(matrix)_{ii}=tr(matrix)##.
 

Orodruin

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2018 Award
16,096
6,036
What is tr(AB) in terms of the components of A and B?

Also, I am unsure why you would want to write this out explicitly. It is far (far!) easier to use gamma matrix and trace relations to compute the trace.
 

vanhees71

Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
13,501
5,407
There are some useful formulae for such traces in the appendix of Peskin&Schroeder. You can derive them by using the anticommutation relations of the Dirac matrices.
 
44
0
What is tr(AB) in terms of the components of A and B?

Also, I am unsure why you would want to write this out explicitly. It is far (far!) easier to use gamma matrix and trace relations to compute the trace.
I might have not been clear, I'm sorry. I do want to use the trace identities in order to do the calculations. I just wanted to write out the indices explicitly so I show clearly that the numerator is indeed a trace.
 

vanhees71

Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
13,501
5,407
First the matrix product is (Einstein summation convention used)
$$(AB)_{ij}=A_{ik} B_{kj}$$
Then the trace is the sum of the diagonal elements. In the Ricci calculus you just have to set ##i=j## in the above formula (implying summation over ##i## then of course):
$$\mathrm{Tr}(AB)=A_{ik} B_{ki}.$$
 

Related Threads for: Trace of a product of Dirac Matrices in a Fermion loop

Replies
4
Views
929
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
955
Replies
5
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Top