Flattening Equation: Solve for Equatorial Radius a

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stevebd1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical modification of equations to determine the equatorial radius (a) of a rapidly spinning neutron star. The key equations involve the flattening ratio (f), gravitational constant (G), rotation period (T), and density (ρ). The user, Steve, seeks a method to combine two fractions into one and isolate 'a' for easier calculation. The derived equation simplifies the trial and error process for calculating 'a' significantly, but no straightforward solution exists, and Cardano's cubic formula is suggested for further exploration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of astrophysics concepts, particularly neutron star physics.
  • Familiarity with mathematical equations involving gravitational constants and rotational dynamics.
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation, specifically solving cubic equations.
  • Experience with mathematical software or tools for complex calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Cardano's cubic formula for solving polynomial equations.
  • Explore the relationship between rotational velocity and equatorial radius in astrophysical contexts.
  • Study the implications of density and volume changes in rapidly spinning celestial bodies.
  • Investigate numerical methods for solving nonlinear equations in astrophysics.
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, mathematicians, and students studying neutron star dynamics or those interested in advanced mathematical modeling techniques.

stevebd1
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
747
Reaction score
41
The equation is rooted in astrophysics but the question is related to the mathematical modification of two equations.

Basically the following are two equations which provide the flattening ratio for a rapidly spinning neutron star-

\frac{3\pi}{2GT^{2}\rho} = \textit{f} = 1-\frac{b}{a}

G- gravitational constant, T- rotation period (in seconds) and \rho is density, \textit{f}- flattening ratio, a- long radius (equatorial), b- short radius (polar)

The LHS equation is relevant to rotation and density (which is relevant to length a, the equatorial radius and length b, the polar radius). The RHS equation is relevant to the relationship between the 2 radii, a and b. I haven't find a method which simply produces an answer for the equatorial radius a, instead it's a process of trial and error using both equations until they agree on an answer. In an attempt to create just one equation, I substituted the formulas for time and density and based on the apparent fact that during flattening, the volume of the neutron star changes but the actual cross sectional area of a compact star ~ stays the same, b = R^{2}/a, which produces the equation below-

\frac{3.125 R^{2}\alpha^{2}Gm}{a^{3}c^{2}}+\frac{R^{2}}{a^{2}}=1

R- radius of neutron star at rest, \alpha- spin parameter (0 -1), G- gravitational constant, m- mass, a- long radius (equatorial), c- speed of light

which working out the constants provides-

\frac{2.32e10^{-27}R^{2}\alpha^{2}m}{a^{3}}+\frac{R^{2}}{a^{2}}=1

which makes the trial and error process for calculating a (equatorial radius) much quicker. My question is, how do I combine the two separate fractions into one (removing the plus sign) and if possible, how do I move 'a' over to one side of the equation in order to simply calculate the equatorial radius. Any feedback is welcome.

Steve



Equations-

T=\frac{1}{f_{Hz}}

T- rotation period (in seconds), f_{Hz}- frequency (in Hz)

where

f_{Hz}=\frac{v}{2\pi a}

v- rotational velocity at equator edge, a- long radius (equatorial)

v=\frac{J}{ma(2/5)}

J- angular momentum, m- mass, a- long radius (equatorial)

J=\frac{\alpha Gm^{2}}{c}

J- angular momentum, \alpha- spin parameter (0 - 1), G- gravitational radius, m- mass, c- speed of light

and

\rho=\frac{m}{V}

m- mass, V- volume

where

V=\frac{4}{3}\pi a^{2}b

a- long radius (equatorial), b- short radius (polar)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ignoring all but the parts relevant to your specific question, you have
\frac{A}{a^3}+ \frac{B}{a^2}= 1

Multiplying both sides of the equation by a3 gives A+ Ba= a3 or
a3- Ba- A= 0.

There isn't going to be any simple solution. You can try using Cardano's cubic formula:

http://www.math.vanderbilt.edu/~schectex/courses/cubic/

but it isn't going to be nice!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
966
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
979
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
608