Flattening Equation: Solve for Equatorial Radius a

  • Thread starter Thread starter stevebd1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on deriving a single equation to calculate the equatorial radius (a) of a rapidly spinning neutron star using two equations related to its flattening ratio. The left-hand side of the equation involves gravitational constant, rotation period, and density, while the right-hand side relates the equatorial and polar radii. The user seeks to combine two fractions into one and isolate 'a' for easier calculation. Feedback suggests that the resulting equation can be transformed into a cubic form, but it may not yield a straightforward solution. The complexity of the problem indicates that advanced methods, such as Cardano's cubic formula, may be necessary for resolution.
stevebd1
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
747
Reaction score
41
The equation is rooted in astrophysics but the question is related to the mathematical modification of two equations.

Basically the following are two equations which provide the flattening ratio for a rapidly spinning neutron star-

\frac{3\pi}{2GT^{2}\rho} = \textit{f} = 1-\frac{b}{a}

G- gravitational constant, T- rotation period (in seconds) and \rho is density, \textit{f}- flattening ratio, a- long radius (equatorial), b- short radius (polar)

The LHS equation is relevant to rotation and density (which is relevant to length a, the equatorial radius and length b, the polar radius). The RHS equation is relevant to the relationship between the 2 radii, a and b. I haven't find a method which simply produces an answer for the equatorial radius a, instead it's a process of trial and error using both equations until they agree on an answer. In an attempt to create just one equation, I substituted the formulas for time and density and based on the apparent fact that during flattening, the volume of the neutron star changes but the actual cross sectional area of a compact star ~ stays the same, b = R^{2}/a, which produces the equation below-

\frac{3.125 R^{2}\alpha^{2}Gm}{a^{3}c^{2}}+\frac{R^{2}}{a^{2}}=1

R- radius of neutron star at rest, \alpha- spin parameter (0 -1), G- gravitational constant, m- mass, a- long radius (equatorial), c- speed of light

which working out the constants provides-

\frac{2.32e10^{-27}R^{2}\alpha^{2}m}{a^{3}}+\frac{R^{2}}{a^{2}}=1

which makes the trial and error process for calculating a (equatorial radius) much quicker. My question is, how do I combine the two separate fractions into one (removing the plus sign) and if possible, how do I move 'a' over to one side of the equation in order to simply calculate the equatorial radius. Any feedback is welcome.

Steve



Equations-

T=\frac{1}{f_{Hz}}

T- rotation period (in seconds), f_{Hz}- frequency (in Hz)

where

f_{Hz}=\frac{v}{2\pi a}

v- rotational velocity at equator edge, a- long radius (equatorial)

v=\frac{J}{ma(2/5)}

J- angular momentum, m- mass, a- long radius (equatorial)

J=\frac{\alpha Gm^{2}}{c}

J- angular momentum, \alpha- spin parameter (0 - 1), G- gravitational radius, m- mass, c- speed of light

and

\rho=\frac{m}{V}

m- mass, V- volume

where

V=\frac{4}{3}\pi a^{2}b

a- long radius (equatorial), b- short radius (polar)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ignoring all but the parts relevant to your specific question, you have
\frac{A}{a^3}+ \frac{B}{a^2}= 1

Multiplying both sides of the equation by a3 gives A+ Ba= a3 or
a3- Ba- A= 0.

There isn't going to be any simple solution. You can try using Cardano's cubic formula:

http://www.math.vanderbilt.edu/~schectex/courses/cubic/

but it isn't going to be nice!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
603
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
640
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
298
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
4K