Flattening Equation: Solve for Equatorial Radius a

  • Thread starter Thread starter stevebd1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving a single equation to calculate the equatorial radius (a) of a rapidly spinning neutron star using two equations related to its flattening ratio. The left-hand side of the equation involves gravitational constant, rotation period, and density, while the right-hand side relates the equatorial and polar radii. The user seeks to combine two fractions into one and isolate 'a' for easier calculation. Feedback suggests that the resulting equation can be transformed into a cubic form, but it may not yield a straightforward solution. The complexity of the problem indicates that advanced methods, such as Cardano's cubic formula, may be necessary for resolution.
stevebd1
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
747
Reaction score
41
The equation is rooted in astrophysics but the question is related to the mathematical modification of two equations.

Basically the following are two equations which provide the flattening ratio for a rapidly spinning neutron star-

\frac{3\pi}{2GT^{2}\rho} = \textit{f} = 1-\frac{b}{a}

G- gravitational constant, T- rotation period (in seconds) and \rho is density, \textit{f}- flattening ratio, a- long radius (equatorial), b- short radius (polar)

The LHS equation is relevant to rotation and density (which is relevant to length a, the equatorial radius and length b, the polar radius). The RHS equation is relevant to the relationship between the 2 radii, a and b. I haven't find a method which simply produces an answer for the equatorial radius a, instead it's a process of trial and error using both equations until they agree on an answer. In an attempt to create just one equation, I substituted the formulas for time and density and based on the apparent fact that during flattening, the volume of the neutron star changes but the actual cross sectional area of a compact star ~ stays the same, b = R^{2}/a, which produces the equation below-

\frac{3.125 R^{2}\alpha^{2}Gm}{a^{3}c^{2}}+\frac{R^{2}}{a^{2}}=1

R- radius of neutron star at rest, \alpha- spin parameter (0 -1), G- gravitational constant, m- mass, a- long radius (equatorial), c- speed of light

which working out the constants provides-

\frac{2.32e10^{-27}R^{2}\alpha^{2}m}{a^{3}}+\frac{R^{2}}{a^{2}}=1

which makes the trial and error process for calculating a (equatorial radius) much quicker. My question is, how do I combine the two separate fractions into one (removing the plus sign) and if possible, how do I move 'a' over to one side of the equation in order to simply calculate the equatorial radius. Any feedback is welcome.

Steve



Equations-

T=\frac{1}{f_{Hz}}

T- rotation period (in seconds), f_{Hz}- frequency (in Hz)

where

f_{Hz}=\frac{v}{2\pi a}

v- rotational velocity at equator edge, a- long radius (equatorial)

v=\frac{J}{ma(2/5)}

J- angular momentum, m- mass, a- long radius (equatorial)

J=\frac{\alpha Gm^{2}}{c}

J- angular momentum, \alpha- spin parameter (0 - 1), G- gravitational radius, m- mass, c- speed of light

and

\rho=\frac{m}{V}

m- mass, V- volume

where

V=\frac{4}{3}\pi a^{2}b

a- long radius (equatorial), b- short radius (polar)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ignoring all but the parts relevant to your specific question, you have
\frac{A}{a^3}+ \frac{B}{a^2}= 1

Multiplying both sides of the equation by a3 gives A+ Ba= a3 or
a3- Ba- A= 0.

There isn't going to be any simple solution. You can try using Cardano's cubic formula:

http://www.math.vanderbilt.edu/~schectex/courses/cubic/

but it isn't going to be nice!
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top