Erenkov Radiation: Charged Particles Explained

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ed Aboud
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around Čerenkov radiation, specifically addressing how charged particles can exceed the speed of light in a medium, the reasons behind the blue glow associated with this phenomenon, and the underlying mechanisms of radiation emission. Participants explore theoretical aspects, conceptual clarifications, and analogies related to the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about how charged particles can travel faster than the speed of light in a medium while still adhering to the principles of special relativity.
  • One participant explains that while it is impossible to accelerate a particle to the speed of light in a vacuum, particles can exceed the speed of light in a medium, leading to Čerenkov radiation.
  • Another participant draws an analogy between Čerenkov radiation and a sonic boom, suggesting that the radiation results from the disturbance caused by the particle as it moves through the medium.
  • There is a discussion about the blue glow of Čerenkov radiation, with some attributing it to the energy of the charged particles and their deceleration, while others reference the continuous spectrum of emitted radiation.
  • One participant cites a Wikipedia article, indicating that the radiation is emitted by electrons in the medium that are disturbed by the charged particle, and discusses the conditions under which constructive interference occurs.
  • Concerns are raised about whether Čerenkov radiation occurs at all speeds and the conditions necessary for its observation, particularly regarding destructive versus constructive interference of emitted waves.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying viewpoints on the mechanisms of Čerenkov radiation and the reasons for its characteristic blue glow. There is no consensus on the exact conditions or explanations for the phenomena discussed, indicating multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the dependence of Čerenkov radiation on the speed of particles relative to the speed of light in the medium, but the discussion includes unresolved questions about the influence of medium properties such as temperature and density on the radiation spectrum.

Ed Aboud
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
Čerenkov radiation

Hi all.
I don't understand how charged particles can travel faster than the speed of light in that substance.
I know SR still holds , and why does it produce a blue glow?
Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well.. the only thing that SR would state is that it's impossible to accelerate a partikle to c, the speed of light in vacuum. The speed of light in a medium is often lower than c though! So it is possible to send particles through a medium, that travel faster than a light wave in that medium, although not faster than c. The reason that it produces a blue glow is because accelerating charge emits radiation (I don't know why yet), why it is specifically blue is probably related to the energy of the particles.
 
ehj said:
Well.. the only thing that SR would state is that it's impossible to accelerate a partikle to c, the speed of light in vacuum. The speed of light in a medium is often lower than c though! So it is possible to send particles through a medium, that travel faster than a light wave in that medium, although not faster than c. The reason that it produces a blue glow is because accelerating charge emits radiation (I don't know why yet), why it is specifically blue is probably related to the energy of the particles.

Cerenkov radiation is similar to the sonic boom from a jet aircraft. Think of the aircraft as a particle exceeding the propagation speed of sound in the medium. The sound waves pile up and amplify, because the source of the sound waves is keeping up with the emitted wavefront, so that all the wave fronts are superimposed on each other. The radiation is more due to the charged particle disturbing electrons in the atoms of the medium as it passes through it, because the particle is not necessarily accelerating through the medium.
 
Hi kev! :smile:

But why blue?
 
"The radiation is more due to the charged particle disturbing electrons in the atoms of the medium as it passes through it"
And how do the disturbed electrons emit radiation then? The radiation is not caused by excitations in the atoms, but as you said yourself by the sonic boom effect, and the fact that accelerating charge gives off radiation. It is the acceleration that gives rise to the radiation. The charged particles are decelerating as they bump into other atoms but it's the deceleration of the charged particle that causes the radiation. Cerenkov radiation is a continuous spectrum and therefore not caused by excitations in the atoms it bumps into.
 
ehj said:
Cerenkov radiation is a continuous spectrum and therefore not caused by excitations in the atoms it bumps into.

Hi ehj! :smile: :smile:

But why blue? :smile:
 
well.. I think it has something to do with the energy of the charged particle, and how fast they decelerate. You can try reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation
It says in there that the spectrum is continuous and most of the radiation is ultraviolet. It's therefore likely that what we're seeing is the part of the spectrum with low energy, the blue light, because right after blue light the ultraviolet comes.
 
ehj said:
well.. I think it has something to do with the energy of the charged particle, and how fast they decelerate. You can try reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation
It says in there that the spectrum is continuous and most of the radiation is ultraviolet. It's therefore likely that what we're seeing is the part of the spectrum with low energy, the blue light, because right after blue light the ultraviolet comes.

The wikipedia article you linked to says

"As a charged particle travels, it disrupts the local electromagnetic field (EM) in its medium. Electrons in the atoms of the medium will be displaced and polarized by the passing EM field of a charged particle. Photons are emitted as an insulator's electrons restore themselves to equilibrium after the disruption has passed. (In a conductor, the EM disruption can be restored without emitting a photon.) In normal circumstances, these photons destructively interfere with each other and no radiation is detected. However, when a disruption which travels faster than light is propagating through the medium, the photons constructively interfere and intensify the observed radiation."

I read that as the radiation being emitted by the electrons in the atoms of the medium disturbed by the passing charged particle.
 
Hi ehj!

Thanks for the wiki reference :smile:

Looking at it, it seems that all charged particles going through a medium create Cherenkov waves, even at low speeds (and that this depends on speed but not on acceleration);

but that these waves always destructively interfere, so causing no effect;

except if the particle is moving faster-than-light-in-the-medium, and then only in the "electromagnetic boom" shock-wave caused by the wave fronts crashing into each other, in which they constructively interfere, producing actual photons.

I think. :rolleyes:
ehj said:
It says in there that the spectrum is continuous and most of the radiation is ultraviolet.

But why is most of it ultraviolet?

Does it depend on the temperature of the medium? Or its density? Or some gradient feature?
:cry: :cry: Maam! … :cry: :cry:
:smile: :smile: :smile: But why blue? :smile: :smile: :smile:
 
  • #10
if that's true then Cherenkov radiation should be produced whenever radiation enters or leaves a substance regardless of the speed of the particles
 
  • #11
No, because then the interference is destructive, and the waves cancel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K