Charged Particles Radiating in "Free Fall" into Black Holes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on whether a charged particle radiates while in free fall into a black hole. The definitive answer, supported by the work of Bryce S. DeWitt and Robert W. Brehme in their 1960 paper "Radiation damping in a gravitational field," is that a charged particle does radiate due to the influence of its Coulomb field, which prevents it from following a geodetic path. Although the radiation may be negligible in practical scenarios, the implications suggest that different particles, such as electrons and neutrons, may not accelerate identically in a gravitational field, potentially leading to ionization of atoms falling into black holes. The complexity of the electromagnetic fields in curved spacetime further complicates the understanding of radiation in these conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and geodesics
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic theory, particularly Coulomb fields
  • Knowledge of black hole physics and gravitational effects on particles
  • Basic grasp of quantum mechanics and particle behavior in gravitational fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Radiation damping in a gravitational field" by Bryce S. DeWitt and Robert W. Brehme
  • Explore the implications of electromagnetic fields in curved spacetime
  • Investigate the behavior of charged particles in strong gravitational fields
  • Study experimental evidence of radiation from plasma gas falling into black holes
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and researchers interested in the interaction of charged particles with gravitational fields, particularly in the context of black hole physics and radiation phenomena.

sha1000
Messages
125
Reaction score
6
Hello everyone,

"Does a charged particle radiate in free-fall?".

I read many threads on this subject and I was surprised to find out that there is no unanimous "Yes or No" answer to this question. Here is an interesting answer from researchgate.net:

The question is widely discussed in the web and seems most definitively have been answered by a work:
Bryce S DeWitt, Robert W Brehme : Radiation damping in a gravitational field. Annals of Physics, Volume 9.2 1960, pp. 220-259.
The answer is yes.
I copy a sentence from the abstract of this work:
"The particle tries its best to satisfy the equivalence principle in spite of its charge. It is only prevented from doing so (i.e., from following a geodetic path) because of the fact that, contrary to the case of flat space-time, the electromagnetic Green's function in a curved space-time does not generally vanish inside the light cone, but gives rise to a “tail” on any initially sharp pulse of radiation."......


......the full statement was that the charge would not radiate if it would follow a geodetic line exactly. As DeWitt and Brehme point out in detail the charge caries with it a Coulomb field which produces reaction forces and prevents the charge from following a geodetic line precisely and by this mechanism let's the charge radiate and changes the answer to yes. Of course, the quantitative aspect of the matter is not clear from this and it may well be that 'yes' may mean 'negligible in all conceivable practical circumstances'.

My question:

Lets suppose that a charged particle radiates in the gravitational "free fall" (does not follow its geodesic line precisely). From this point one may conclude that an electron and the neutron do not accelerate in the same manner in the gravitational field., right? Would this mean that an atom which is falling into the black hole will ionize at some moment (because of the acceleration differences of the elementary particles)? Do we see this experimentally? Or there is no radiation whatsoever and the stars are quietly falling into the black holes?

Thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Glurth and BvU
Physics news on Phys.org
I think no radiation take place in free fall of a single charge into neutral charged BH. In co-moving frame with a falling charge, there is no reason for photon to be generated. Not a single charge but heated plasma gas falling into BF emit X-ray, but it is another story for you I suppose.
 
sweet springs said:
I think no radiation take place in free fall. In co-moving frame with falling charge, there is no reason of photon generated.
The problem is that the fields associated with the charge aren't pointlike, so neglecting curvature by considering only a small region of spacetime neglects the particle's fields. And the fields must be changing because the particle is moving through regions of spacetime with different curvature. Hence the complexity.

I don't know enough about it to answer the OP's question.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sha1000

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K