Beyond minimal standard model.

arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,481
Reaction score
187
Has anyone got good pointed in higgs models beyond the minimal? The PDG review is too small for my taste.

From Lamb's balance, I am getting the prediction of the following particle spectra

68 GeV. According L3, it could be H+
Z0 as usual, and W+ as usual, almost
115 GeV. According ALEPH, it could be any Higgs
175 GeV. Degenerated with Top mass? Or just the Top, no new boson after all
246 GeV. It coincides with the EW higgs field scale in the minimal model, but it should appear physically, thus as a particle.

Does this spectrum fit with some SUSY model, using the degeneracy at 175? For complete SUSY breaking, I believe it does not fit because H+ is lower than Z0.

A two doublets higgs model is enough for this spectrum, but is it unique? What about using triplet higgs, or two doublets plus singlet, Zee model etc? I am no risking a predition for a 45-49 GeV particle because it is weaker than the others (and I believe the Z0 experiments have already completely disproved this possibility, am I right here?), but I could try it if it results good for a triplet model or similar.

Alejandro
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just a fast note; I have uploaded in my website the working copy of the http://dftuz.unizar.es/%7Erivero/research/LS9530.pdf about this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thread 'Toponium Discovered'

Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
View full post »

Thread 'Dirac-Delta from Normalization of Continuous Eigenfunctions'

I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
View full post »

Similar threads

I New Constraints On The Higgs Boson Width
Replies
11
Views
3K
A Just standard model and gravity, up to high energies? An update
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Question regarding 'beauty' in the theories that go beyond the standard model
Replies
2
Views
2K
Neutrino miminal standard model vs string/M-theory
Replies
12
Views
3K
I What are the Priority Tasks for High Energy Physics Beyond the Standard Model?
Replies
1
Views
3K
I The standard model from loop quantum gravity via spinors octonions
Replies
26
Views
4K
Can a Higgs Field in an Isospin Triplet Give Mass to a Standard Model Quark?
Replies
2
Views
3K
A Seeking the Standard Model in E8 plus Supersymmetry
Replies
4
Views
3K
A A strange theory of everything: dust on [itex]\mathbb{R}^{0|18}[/itex]
Replies
4
Views
2K
Is the Higgs Field the Only Way to Explain Mass in the Standard Model?
Replies
11
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top