Would the removal of the sun result in a shockwave?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter daytripper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shockwave Sun The sun
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario of the Sun suddenly disappearing and its implications on gravity and spacetime. Participants explore the theoretical consequences of such an event, including the propagation of gravitational effects and the nature of gravitational waves, while considering the limitations of general relativity in addressing this scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if the Sun were to suddenly disappear, it would take approximately 8 minutes for the effects of gravity to be felt on Earth, referencing the speed of gravity as the speed of light.
  • Another participant argues that the Sun cannot suddenly disappear, as even in an explosion, the mass would disperse at sublight speeds, leading to a gradual change in gravitational influence.
  • A participant mentions gravitational waves and how changes in gravitational potential would affect time and space, suggesting that the Earth would experience movement without warp drive-like acceleration if the Sun were removed.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of the original question, with one participant stating that conservation of energy-momentum in general relativity forbids the possibility of the Sun "suddenly disappearing."
  • Another participant emphasizes that there is no solution to Einstein's equations that describes the scenario of the Sun suddenly disappearing, indicating that the question cannot be properly framed within the framework of general relativity.
  • One participant reflects on the difficulty of restating the question while maintaining its conceptual essence, suggesting that a more realistic scenario might involve a rapidly orbiting pulsar binary.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the scenario of the Sun suddenly disappearing is not physically plausible within the framework of general relativity, but there is no consensus on how to properly address the conceptual implications of such a hypothetical situation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in addressing extreme hypothetical scenarios within general relativity, particularly regarding the absence of solutions for situations that defy conservation laws.

daytripper
Messages
108
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone, good day,
So I understand that gravity travels at the speed of light and such. So naturally, if the Sun were suddenly gone, it'd take ~8 minutes for us to fly off and die. But I was reading Michio Kaku's "Parallel Worlds" and he used the trampoline/bowling ball analogy for gravity and then used the finite speed of waves in a sheet of fabric to say "gravity travels in similar ways". And that got me thinking: if the Sun suddenly disappeared, would the trampoline snap back (and even up), tossing the marble up? Taking the 2d analogy to the 3d, this would mean a sudden jump in time? Yea, I was just thinking of the specifics of the sun disappearing and thought I'd ask you guys to clarify for me.
Thanks.
-DT
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One of the problems with this is that there is no way for the sun to suddenly disappear. Even if it exploded, the mass would fly off at sublight speeds, and the gravity from that mass would change at a leisurely pace.
 
See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_Wave#Effects_of_a_passing_gravitational_wave

for a visualization of passing gravitational waves.

Since gravitational potential would change from Earth and sun combined to Earth alone, yes time and space would change as well...

You can get an idea of the power radiated by the combined system, only roughly 313 watts, at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_Wave#Power_radiated_by_the_Earth-Sun_system

..in other words gravitational waves are normally quite difficult to detect...

Maybe somebody will post a few calculations: my gut tells me the Earth would begin moving without warp drive like acceleration...And if the sun exploded, rather than being quietly "removed", of course we'd be instantly annihilated in a burst of radiation as the gravitational wave reached Earth .
 
daytripper said:
Hello everyone, good day,
So I understand that gravity travels at the speed of light and such. So naturally, if the Sun were suddenly gone, it'd take ~8 minutes for us to fly off and die. But I was reading Michio Kaku's "Parallel Worlds" and he used the trampoline/bowling ball analogy for gravity and then used the finite speed of waves in a sheet of fabric to say "gravity travels in similar ways". And that got me thinking: if the Sun suddenly disappeared, would the trampoline snap back (and even up), tossing the marble up? Taking the 2d analogy to the 3d, this would mean a sudden jump in time? Yea, I was just thinking of the specifics of the sun disappearing and thought I'd ask you guys to clarify for me.
Thanks.
-DT

Conservation of energy-momentum in GR forbids the possibility of the Sun "suddenly disappearing" and the situation you describe.
 
Just to clarify a little bit: The reason why we aren't really willing to answer the original question isn't that we're unwilling to consider situations that are "too extreme". We don't mind considering e.g. a spaceship that goes at 0.9999999999999c in one direction and a nanosecond later goes at 0.9999999999999c in the opposite direction, even though it would smash the ship into a quark-gluon plasma or something. In that case we can at least describe the curve that represents that (absurdly ridiculous) motion. But in the case of the Sun "suddenly disappearing", the problem is that there's no solution of Einstein's equation that describes a scenario like that. So the theory doesn't really say anything about it. We can't even ask the question properly in the framework of GR.
 
Fredrik said:
Just to clarify a little bit: The reason why we aren't really willing to answer the original question isn't that we're unwilling to consider situations that are "too extreme". We don't mind considering e.g. a spaceship that goes at 0.9999999999999c in one direction and a nanosecond later goes at 0.9999999999999c in the opposite direction, even though it would smash the ship into a quark-gluon plasma or something. In that case we can at least describe the curve that represents that (absurdly ridiculous) motion. But in the case of the Sun "suddenly disappearing", the problem is that there's no solution of Einstein's equation that describes a scenario like that. So the theory doesn't really say anything about it. We can't even ask the question properly in the framework of GR.

Yea, I suppose so. I've asked a question or two on these forums (often of the form "a spaceship traveling 0.99999c") and never realized how realistic my questions were. I can't really think of a way to restate the question while still getting at the concept, so I declare close-dom.
 
daytripper said:
Yea, I suppose so. I've asked a question or two on these forums (often of the form "a spaceship traveling 0.99999c") and never realized how realistic my questions were. I can't really think of a way to restate the question while still getting at the concept, so I declare close-dom.

I think the closest you might get is rapid orbiting pulsar binary. I believe this is what they're trying to detect gravity waves from.

The point is, your question should still be valid within known physics if we contrive it right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K