Can Fourier Transformation be Used for Amplitude of a Free Particle?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Fourier transformation in calculating the amplitude of a free particle's propagation as described in Peskin & Schroeder. The participants analyze the equation for the amplitude, specifically focusing on the integral representation and the evaluation of the Gaussian integral. The correct approach involves completing the square in the exponent, leading to the expression \(\left(\frac{m}{2\pi it}\right)^{3/2} e^{im(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}_{0})/2t}\), which is derived from the Fourier transform of the amplitude. Misunderstandings arise regarding the proper evaluation of the Fourier transform and the substitution of variables.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, specifically the concept of wave functions and amplitudes.
  • Familiarity with Fourier transformation techniques in the context of quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of Gaussian integrals and their evaluation methods.
  • Proficiency in complex analysis, particularly in completing the square for integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the propagator in quantum mechanics, focusing on the role of Fourier transforms.
  • Learn about Gaussian integrals and their applications in quantum field theory.
  • Explore the implications of the path integral formulation in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the mathematical foundations of complex analysis as applied to quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum field theory and the application of Fourier analysis in physics.

karlsson
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I hope this is the correct place for my question. I posted it here, because it`s from Peskin & Schroeder:
"Consider the amplitude for a free particle to propagate from \mathbf{x}_{0} to \mathbf{x} :

U(t)=\left\langle \mathbf{x}\right|e^{-iHt}\left|\mathbf{x_{0}}\right\rangle

In nonrelativistic quantum mechanics we have E=p^2/2m, so

U(t)&=&\left\langle \mathbf{x}\right|e^{-i(\mathbf{p}^{2}/2m)t}\left|\mathbf{x}_{0}\right\rangle

<br /> =\int\frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^{3}}\left\langle \mathbf{x}\right|e^{-i(\mathbf{p}^{2}/2m)t}\left|\mathbf{p}\right\rangle \left\langle \mathbf{p}\right.\left|\mathbf{x_{0}}\right\rangle

<br /> =\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{3}}\int d^{3}p\, e^{-i(\mathbf{p}^{2}/2m)t}\cdot e^{i\mathbf{p}\cdot(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}_{0})}<br />

<br /> =\left(\frac{m}{2\pi it}\right)^{3/2}\, e^{im(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}_{0})/2t}}<br />
."

I don't understand the last equation.
Why I can't use the fourier-transformation:

<br /> =\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{3}}\int d^{3}p\, e^{-i\mathbf{p}\cdot(\mathbf{x}_{0}-\mathbf{x})}\widetilde{f}(\mathbf{p})<br />

<br /> =f(\mathbf{p})<br />

<br /> =e^{-i(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}_{0})^{2}/2m)t}<br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
but is what you have don actually ;)

marco
 
Sry, I don't understand. My solution is a different one as from Peskin & Schroeder. But why?
 
karlsson said:
<br /> =\int\frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^{3}}\left\langle \mathbf{x}\right|e^{-i(\mathbf{p}^{2}/2m)t}\left|\mathbf{p}\right\rangle \left\langle \mathbf{p}\right.\left|\mathbf{x_{0}}\right\rangle

<br /> =\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{3}}\int d^{3}p\, e^{-i(\mathbf{p}^{2}/2m)t}\cdot e^{i\mathbf{p}\cdot(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}_{0})}<br />

<br /> =\left(\frac{m}{2\pi it}\right)^{3/2}\, e^{im(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}_{0})/2t}}<br />
."

I don't understand the last equation.

The last step is made by completing the square and evaluating the gaussian integral (although with complex coefficient). I suspect the expression should be ~exp[im(x-x_0)^2/2t] though...

Why I can't use the fourier-transformation:

The last step is precisely the evaluation of a Fourier transform. In what you write next:

<br /> =\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{3}}\int d^{3}p\, e^{-i\mathbf{p}\cdot(\mathbf{x}_{0}-\mathbf{x})}\widetilde{f}(\mathbf{p})<br />

<br /> =f(\mathbf{p})<br />

<br /> =e^{-i(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}_{0})^{2}/2m)t}<br />

It looks like you have simply taken \widetilde{f}=f and replaced the \mathbf{p} argument with \mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}_0.. If so then this is wrong. The Fourier transform should be evaluated as in the last step of your first equation (i.e. completing the square as I wrote)
 
jensa said:
I suspect the expression should be ~exp[im(x-x_0)^2/2t] though...

You are right.

jensa said:
The last step is made by completing the square and evaluating the gaussian integral ...

Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
864
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K