Proving Poisson Brackets Homework Statement

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving an equality involving Poisson brackets in the context of Hamiltonian mechanics. The original poster presents a series expansion of a function f in terms of the Hamiltonian H, coordinates p, and q, and seeks guidance on how to approach the proof without knowing the specific form of H.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of not knowing the Hamiltonian H and consider how the properties of Poisson brackets might be utilized. There are discussions about expanding f as a Taylor series and the relationship between derivatives and Poisson brackets.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights into the relationship between the Hamiltonian and the function f, with some suggesting that the proof may not require the explicit form of H. Questions about the nature of derivatives and their relationship to Poisson brackets are being explored, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

There are ongoing discussions about the assumptions regarding the function f, particularly in relation to whether it is a constant of motion, which affects the derivatives involved in the proof.

Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



<br /> <br /> f(p(t),q(t)) = f_o + \frac{t^1}{1!}\{H,f_o\}+\frac{t^2}{2!}\{H,\{H,f_o\}}+...<br /> <br />
Prove the above equality. p & q are just coords and momenta

How do we do this if we don't know what H is?
Where do we start?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nusc said:

Homework Statement



<br /> <br /> f(p(t),q(t)) = f_o + \frac{t^1}{1!}\{H,f_o\}+\frac{t^2}{2!}\{H,\{H,f_o\}}+...<br /> <br />
Prove the above equality. p & q are just coords and momenta

How do we do this if we don't know what H is?
Where do we start?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Looks like you may not need to know what the Hamiltonian is, just how the Hamiltonian works in the Poisson bracket (assume f is not a constant of motion):

<br /> \frac{df(q,p)}{dt}&amp;=\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial q}\frac{dq}{dt}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial p}\frac{dp}{dt}=\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial q}\frac{\partial H}{\partial p}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial p}\frac{\partial H}{\partial q}=\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}+\{f,H\}<br />

So, using this, it looks like you would expand f(q,p) as a Taylor series. Note that if f(q,p) is a constant of motion, f_{,t}=0 so that you have

<br /> \frac{df(q,p)}{dt}=\{f,H\}<br />
 
What's the theorem that says mixed partials are commutative? Not Claurait's...
 
Also

I know

<br /> \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\{H,f\} = \{\frac{\partial H}{\partial t},f\} + \{H,\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\} <br />

What about for ordinary derivatives?
<br /> \frac{d}{d t}\{H,f\} =?<br />
 
jdwood983 said:
Note that if f(q,p) is a constant of motion, f_{,t}=0 so that you have

<br /> \frac{df(q,p)}{dt}=\{f,H\}<br />

No, if f(q,p) is a constant of motion, then \frac{df}{dt}=0[/itex]. The fact that f has no <i>explicit</i> time dependence (it is given as a function of q and p only), tells you that \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}=0[/itex]
 
Nusc said:
What about for ordinary derivatives?
<br /> \frac{d}{d t}\{H,f\} =?<br />

You tell us...expand the Poisson bracket and calculate the derivatives...what do you get?
 
<br /> \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial f}{\partial q}\frac{\partial H}{\partial p}-\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial f}{\partial p}\frac{\partial H}{\partial q}<br />
 
Okay, now use the product rule...

\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial q}\frac{\partial H}{\partial p}\right)=[/itex]<br /> <br /> ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K