Can Explosives Extinguish Fires by Removing Oxygen?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Chitose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fire
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Explosives can extinguish fires by consuming the locally available oxygen, a method often employed in extinguishing oil well fires. This technique involves using high explosives, such as dynamite, to create a blast that separates the fuel from the heat, effectively snuffing out the flame. The explosion does not create a vacuum but rather displaces the heat and vapor, similar to blowing out a candle. While this method can be effective, it does not eliminate the fuel source, which remains a hazard.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of combustion and fire dynamics
  • Knowledge of explosive materials, specifically high explosives like dynamite
  • Familiarity with oil well fire characteristics
  • Basic principles of physics related to pressure and gas displacement
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the methods used to extinguish oil well fires
  • Learn about the chemical reactions involved in combustion
  • Study the physics of gas displacement and pressure waves
  • Explore safety protocols when dealing with explosives in fire suppression
USEFUL FOR

Fire safety professionals, explosive ordnance experts, environmental engineers, and anyone involved in fire suppression techniques, particularly in industrial settings.

Chitose
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Hello, Chitose wonder chick again.

First, This is NOT my homework.
...........
I herd theory that we can quickly put out the fire by setting explosive right next to it. Suck away oxygen or something I'm not sure

I wonder is this theory is true?

If it's true how come?

Is explosion burn out oxygen in the instant? or blast power push oyxgen around it away and create instant vacuum area?

and... is this physic?

...........
PS. English is not my native languge, forgive me if I'm wrong in gramma or spelling.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Chitose said:
Hello, Chitose wonder chick again.

First, This is NOT my homework.
...........
I herd theory that we can quickly put out the fire by setting explosive right next to it. Suck away oxygen or something I'm not sure

I wonder is this theory is true?

If it's true how come?

Is explosion burn out oxygen in the instant? or blast power push oyxgen around it away and create instant vacuum area?

and... is this physic?

...........
PS. English is not my native languge, forgive me if I'm wrong in gramma or spelling.


Yes a fire can be put out this way. It is often used to put out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_well_fire" . It works by consuming all of the locally available oxygen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Borg said:
Yes a fire can be put out this way. It is often used to put out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_well_fire" . It works by consuming all of the locally available oxygen.

It doesn't work like that.

An oil fire is a cloud of oil-vapour that's burning above a liquid oil. The heat from the vapour evaporates more oil. If you put an explosive next to it you blow the vapour and its heat away from the liquid oil. This will separate the fuel from the heat. It's really the same as blowing out a candle.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
willem2 said:
It doesn't work like that.

An oil fire is a cloud of oil-vapour that's burning above a liquid oil. The heat from the vapour evaporates more oil. If you put an explosive next to it you blow the vapour and its heat away from the liquid oil. This will separate the fuel from the heat. It's really the same as blowing out a candle.

I was quoting what was in the article:

Oil well fires are more difficult to extinguish than regular fires due to the enormous fuel supply for the fire. In fighting a fire at a wellhead, typically high explosives, such as dynamite, are used to consume all the local atmospheric oxygen and snuff the flame out. Doing so removes the oxygen necessary for the fire to burn, but the fire's fuel, whether it be natural gas or oil, is still present which can shower down upon the working crew.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
18K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
14K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K