Exploring the Consequences of Galois Group Isomorphism to Quaternions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of a rational polynomial having a Galois group isomorphic to the quaternions. Participants explore the relationship between the degree of the polynomial, the structure of its splitting field, and the properties of the Galois group, with a focus on theoretical aspects of Galois theory and polynomial roots.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that if a rational polynomial has a Galois group isomorphic to the quaternions, then the degree of the polynomial must be at least 8.
  • One participant notes that the splitting field K must be simple and that the degree of the minimal polynomial associated with a root must also be 8, leading to the conclusion that the degree of the polynomial f is at least n.
  • Another participant questions whether an automorphism fixing the base field k is necessarily the identity, seeking clarification on the nature of the automorphism and its implications for the roots of the polynomial.
  • It is proposed that the roots of the minimal polynomial are also roots of the polynomial f, as K serves as the splitting field for both.
  • A participant mentions that the quaternions can be represented as a subgroup of S_8, indicating that the polynomial must have 8 roots in the splitting field K over the rationals.
  • One participant shares a personal example involving a polynomial with roots expressed as sums of square roots, speculating whether it could relate to the quaternion group.
  • Another participant inquires whether S_8 is the only permutation group that contains the quaternions as a subgroup, suggesting there may be other relevant groups.
  • It is asserted that there are multiple subgroups of S_8 that include the quaternions, emphasizing their action on 8 non-rational roots.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the implications of the Galois group structure, with some agreeing on the necessity of the polynomial degree being at least 8, while others raise questions about specific details and relationships. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of the quaternion group in relation to other permutation groups.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential limitations in their arguments, including assumptions about the nature of automorphisms and the relationship between minimal polynomials and the original polynomial. There is also a lack of consensus on the uniqueness of S_8 as a containing group for the quaternions.

math_grl
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
This statement was made in my class and I'm trying still to piece together the details of it...

We say that some rational polynomial, f has a Galois group isomorphic to the quaternions. We can then conclude that the polynomial has degree n \geq 8.

I have a few thoughts on this and I might be overlooking something simple...but letting K be the splitting field, then [K:\mathbb{Q}] divides n! so n \geq 4.

My other thought is that since the Galois group has finite number of subgroups then between K and the rational numbers are a finite number of intermediate fields, thus K is simple. With K \cong \mathbb{Q}(a) for some root of a minimal polynomial whose degree must be 8 since \mathbb{Q}(a) \cong \mathbb{Q}[x]/\langle m_a \rangle.

Does m_a divide f or something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(notation: In this post I shall use (\sigma f) to denote f with \sigma applied to all the coefficients of f; it's well-known that the new polynomial has the same degree and if x is a root of f, then \sigma x is a root of \sigma f).

math_grl said:
Does m_a divide f or something?

Almost, let \beta \in K be a root of f. Let \sigma : K \to K be an automorphism fixing k and sending \beta \mapsto \alpha. Now (\sigma f)(\alpha) = 0 so m_\alpha | \sigma f and since \deg(\sigma f) = \deg(f) this let's you conclude 8=\deg(m_\alpha) \leq \deg(f) = n.
 
rasmhop said:
Let \sigma : K \to K be an automorphism fixing k and sending \beta \mapsto \alpha. Now (\sigma f)(\alpha) = 0 so m_\alpha | \sigma f and since \deg(\sigma f) = \deg(f) this let's you conclude 8=\deg(m_\alpha) \leq \deg(f) = n.

Isn't an automorphism from K to K fixing k the identity? or do you mean fixing \mathbb{Q}, the base field?

And just so I understand what you are trying to say is that the roots of m_a are roots of f, since K is the splitting field for both m_a and f?
 
As a permutation group, the quaternions are a subgroup of S_8 generated by the permutations \{(1234)(5678), (1537)(2846)\}. Therefore f must have 8 roots in K/\mathbb{Q}. So the degree of f must be \geq 8 (with equality if f is irreducible).
 
I shouldn't mess with this question but I'm curious: I once did an algebra problem where one of the roots of the polynomial was

sqrt(2) + sqrt(3) + sqrt(5)

and of course there are eight roots for all possible choices of the signs, so there's an eighth degree polynomial. I wonder if that's an example of the quaternion group?
 
mrbohn1 said:
As a permutation group, the quaternions are a subgroup of S_8 generated by the permutations \{(1234)(5678), (1537)(2846)\}. .

Is S8 the only permutation group the quaternions are a subgroup of?
 
I'm pretty sure there are a few subgroups of S_8 containg the quaternions, although I don't know off-hand. For the purposes of this question, all you need to know is that as a permutation group they act on 8 objects - in this case: 8 non-rational roots.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K