Exploring the Consequences of Galois Group Isomorphism to Quaternions

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of a rational polynomial having a Galois group isomorphic to the quaternions, concluding that such a polynomial must have a degree of at least 8. The splitting field K of the polynomial is shown to have a finite number of intermediate fields, indicating that K is simple and that its degree over the rationals must be 8 if irreducible. The participants explore the relationship between the roots of the minimal polynomial and the original polynomial, affirming that the roots of the minimal polynomial are indeed roots of the polynomial f. They also discuss the quaternion group's role as a subgroup of S_8, which acts on the eight roots of the polynomial. The conversation highlights the complexity of Galois theory and its connection to polynomial roots and group theory.
math_grl
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
This statement was made in my class and I'm trying still to piece together the details of it...

We say that some rational polynomial, f has a Galois group isomorphic to the quaternions. We can then conclude that the polynomial has degree n \geq 8.

I have a few thoughts on this and I might be overlooking something simple...but letting K be the splitting field, then [K:\mathbb{Q}] divides n! so n \geq 4.

My other thought is that since the Galois group has finite number of subgroups then between K and the rational numbers are a finite number of intermediate fields, thus K is simple. With K \cong \mathbb{Q}(a) for some root of a minimal polynomial whose degree must be 8 since \mathbb{Q}(a) \cong \mathbb{Q}[x]/\langle m_a \rangle.

Does m_a divide f or something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(notation: In this post I shall use (\sigma f) to denote f with \sigma applied to all the coefficients of f; it's well-known that the new polynomial has the same degree and if x is a root of f, then \sigma x is a root of \sigma f).

math_grl said:
Does m_a divide f or something?

Almost, let \beta \in K be a root of f. Let \sigma : K \to K be an automorphism fixing k and sending \beta \mapsto \alpha. Now (\sigma f)(\alpha) = 0 so m_\alpha | \sigma f and since \deg(\sigma f) = \deg(f) this let's you conclude 8=\deg(m_\alpha) \leq \deg(f) = n.
 
rasmhop said:
Let \sigma : K \to K be an automorphism fixing k and sending \beta \mapsto \alpha. Now (\sigma f)(\alpha) = 0 so m_\alpha | \sigma f and since \deg(\sigma f) = \deg(f) this let's you conclude 8=\deg(m_\alpha) \leq \deg(f) = n.

Isn't an automorphism from K to K fixing k the identity? or do you mean fixing \mathbb{Q}, the base field?

And just so I understand what you are trying to say is that the roots of m_a are roots of f, since K is the splitting field for both m_a and f?
 
As a permutation group, the quaternions are a subgroup of S_8 generated by the permutations \{(1234)(5678), (1537)(2846)\}. Therefore f must have 8 roots in K/\mathbb{Q}. So the degree of f must be \geq 8 (with equality if f is irreducible).
 
I shouldn't mess with this question but I'm curious: I once did an algebra problem where one of the roots of the polynomial was

sqrt(2) + sqrt(3) + sqrt(5)

and of course there are eight roots for all possible choices of the signs, so there's an eighth degree polynomial. I wonder if that's an example of the quaternion group?
 
mrbohn1 said:
As a permutation group, the quaternions are a subgroup of S_8 generated by the permutations \{(1234)(5678), (1537)(2846)\}. .

Is S8 the only permutation group the quaternions are a subgroup of?
 
I'm pretty sure there are a few subgroups of S_8 containg the quaternions, although I don't know off-hand. For the purposes of this question, all you need to know is that as a permutation group they act on 8 objects - in this case: 8 non-rational roots.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
963
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K