Is the Terrafugia Transition the Future of Transportation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Flying
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the Terrafugia Transition, a vehicle that combines flying and driving capabilities. Participants explore its potential as a mode of transportation, the practicality of flying cars, and the implications of such technology on society and commuting. The conversation includes both theoretical considerations and practical applications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the utility of the Terrafugia Transition, suggesting it may be ineffective as both a car and an airplane.
  • Others argue that the vehicle could be beneficial for long-distance commuters, particularly in congested areas like Los Angeles, due to its ability to land at municipal airstrips.
  • A few participants clarify that the Terrafugia Transition is more accurately described as a roadable airplane rather than a flying car.
  • Concerns are raised about safety, particularly regarding the potential for accidents caused by distracted drivers during takeoff and landing.
  • Some participants question the necessity of combining cars and airplanes, suggesting that each mode of transportation serves its own purpose effectively.
  • There are humorous references to fictional flying vehicles, indicating a mix of skepticism and lightheartedness about the concept.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions, with no clear consensus on the viability or necessity of the Terrafugia Transition. Some see potential benefits, while others remain critical or skeptical of the concept.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions about safety, practicality, and the regulatory environment surrounding the use of flying cars. There are also references to historical attempts at similar technologies, indicating a broader context of skepticism regarding flying vehicles.

Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
22,581
Reaction score
7,536
Flying Car a Step Closer to Reality
http://buzz.yahoo.com/buzzlog/93804?fp=1

The Terrafugia Transition.

If one has a spare $194,000 + TTL.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Computer science news on Phys.org
I see two sides to this. 1) If I had 70 people lined up wishing to pay me 150K apiece, I'd be very happy to provide.

2) The ideal flying car doesn't do a lot of driving. If it can fly, why drive? It can park where you want it ; is capable of vertical takeoff, will taxi to the gas pump, and there aren't hords of others who have one, so you don't have to worry about them buzzing about in your airspace.
 
Yay, texting people falling from the sky.
 
One point of clarification, it's not a flying car. It's a roadable airplane.
 
Chitty Chitty Bang Bang!
 
Cyrus said:
One point of clarification, it's not a flying car. It's a roadable airplane.

That was my first idea after seeing the video.

My second idea was that in reality it will be probably useless as both plane and car :devil:
 
James bond would feel like an idiot makeing a get-a-way in this thing. And some of his flying contraptions weren't that much to look at either.

Detective Gadget on the other hand...
 
I'm probably being a bit stupid but surely you wouldn't have clearance just to fly to work/ around the world just off the cuff with this? Or maybe you can ?
 
  • #10
Why some people come up with such stupid stupid ideas? The Airplane has been invented, and so has car. What purpose does it serve to humanity to combine them in one?

Here are more stupid gadgets:

1.jpg

pizzacutters07.jpg
 
  • #11
Desiree said:
Why some people come up with such stupid stupid ideas? The Airplane has been invented, and so has car. What purpose does it serve to humanity to combine them in one?

Here are more stupid gadgets:

1.jpg

pizzacutters07.jpg

You forgot to add

[PLAIN]http://www.mapds.com.au/newsletters/0807/iphone_home.gif

And numerous other great mixtures (Phone/MP3 player).

I don't know, this could be useful, it would certainly get me to college/London a lot quicker than the train! And it would mean no checking in for flights =P.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
Chewy0087 said:
You forgot to add

[PLAIN]http://www.mapds.com.au/newsletters/0807/iphone_home.gif

And numerous other great mixtures (Phone/MP3 player)...

:smile:

I would agree, but now that I have it I'll make sure that I get my money's worth out of it. :devil:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
My friend is just finishing up a 6 month co op (through our school) with these guys. Can't wait to here all about it!
 
  • #14
What makes this different than the other flying cars that we've seen?

1). It has FAA approval as a light aircraft
1a). It doesn't require a regular pilot's license to operate
2). Approved for road use
3). Relatively inexpensive

I can see this being very handy for some business people and long-commuters. It could be worth its weight in gold for someone who, for example, commutes 180 miles each day into and through Los Angeles traffic. The ability to land at any municipal air strip makes it quite practical.
 
  • #15
I wonder how many would have to be built before owners started demanding special freeway entrance ramps that looked like this?

P1240512.JPG
 
  • #16
I just realized that this would never work. There are too many people who blindly follow the car in front of them while they are on their cellphone. Lots of people would be driving off the end of the ramps during takeoffs. :rolleyes:
 
  • #17
Borg said:
I just realized that this would never work. There are too many people who blindly follow the car in front of them while they are on their cellphone. Lots of people would be driving off the end of the ramps during takeoffs. :rolleyes:

:smile: good one
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
15K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K