What are the properties of Rigged Hilbert Space compared to Hilbert Space?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Rigged Hilbert Spaces (RHS) extend traditional Hilbert Spaces to include square integrable functions and their associated momentum functions, which are not square integrable. This framework is essential in quantum mechanics, particularly for dealing with non-stable particle decay states. Key resources for understanding RHS include "Quantum Field Theory I: Basics in Mathematics and Physics" by Eberhard Zeidler and "Introductory Functional Analysis" by Erwin Kreyszig. The discussion highlights the importance of Gelfand triples in the mathematical formulation of quantum field theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hilbert Space properties
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of functional analysis
  • Basic principles of linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Gelfand triples in Rigged Hilbert Spaces
  • Explore the applications of RHS in Quantum Field Theory
  • Read "Quantum Field Theory II: Quantum Electrodynamics" by Eberhard Zeidler
  • Investigate the Riesz Theorem and its implications in functional analysis
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mathematicians, and researchers interested in quantum mechanics and functional analysis, particularly those focusing on the mathematical foundations of quantum field theory.

piareround
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
So I was recently learned that for some square integrable position wave-functions in Hilbert Space have the momentum function is not square integrable. Thus the momentum function are not in hilbert space. However, due to "Fourier's Trick" Dirac discovered for quantum mechanics, the momentum functions behave just like if they where square integrable.

Being a curious physics student, I asked my professor more if there was a "special" space these momentum function where in even though they where not in Hilbert Space.

He told me about this thing called http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rigged_Hilbert_space" , which included both the square integrable functions in Hilbert space and their related momentum functions.

I was kind of confused about what he talked about so I was kind of curious to learn more about Rigged Hilbert Space...

Questions:
1. What are the properties of Rigged Hilbert Space compared to Hilbert Space?
2. Are Rigged Hilbert Spaces also Approximate Hilbert Space? Is a Rigged Hilbert Space what we use in Quantum Field Theory when we are talking about the quantum physics of a particle decay state that are not stable states; a problem that where we use use a Approximate Hilbert Space?
3. Are their any books on Rigged Hilbert Space if I wanted to learn more?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
arkajad said:
Umm...but thanks for my question really was about mathematics linear algebra not philosophy.

So any books about math and physics of Rigged Hilbert Spaces would be nice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, I've fixed the link.
 
arkajad said:
Sorry, I've fixed the link.

lol. So you meant this thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=428384

George Jones said:
Another very readable exposition of functional analysis and spectral theory is given in chapters 1 - 3, 7 - 11 of Introductory Functional Analysis by Erwin Kreyzig.

For a rigourous overview of rigged Hilbert spaces (Gelfand triples) and Dirac notation, I recommend highly sections 11.2, 11.3, and 12.2 from Quantum Field Theory I: Basics in Mathematics and Physics (A Bridge Between Mathematicians and Physicists) and subsection 7.6.4 from Quantum Field Theory II: Quantum Electrodynamics (A Bridge Between Mathematicians and Physicists) by Eberhard Zeidler.
Thanks ^_^ ^_^
 
There is a introductory paper on rigged Hilbert spaces and Gelfand triples: http://www.abhidg.net/RHSclassreport.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tom.stoer said:
There is a introductory paper on rigged Hilbert spaces and Gelfand triples: http://www.abhidg.net/RHSclassreport.pdf

The (Riesz) Theorem in the Appendix is formulated in a way that can be misleading. It says:

"... all linear functionals have the form

F(\phi)=(f,\phi)

where f is a fixed vector and \phi an arbitrary vector. "

The word "fixed" can be misleading. It should say: For every F there is a unique f such that for all \phi

F(\phi)=(f,\phi).

One may add: the one-to-one correspondence between functionals F and representing them vectors f is anti-linear.There is also a lack of consistency between Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 - they use different conventions as regards the scalar product. One is the complex conjugate of the other. (That is the result of my quick perusal of the easy part.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would advise anyone to look on the internet for Rafael de la Madrid's PhD thesis at the Univ of Austin to get a pretty thorough investigation of the Gelfand triples/RHS.

A use of RHS in quantum field theory is found in Bogolubov, Logunov and Todorov's 1975 text on axiomatical QFT (the 1975 edition in English is an enhanced version of the Russian 1969 one).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K