Question about units for angular velocity, time constant

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between angular velocity, natural frequency, and time constants in hydraulic systems. It establishes that natural frequency can be expressed in radians per second (rad/sec) and can be inverted to yield a time constant in seconds. The conversation highlights the ambiguity in choosing between using cycles per second and radians per second for time constant calculations, emphasizing that both methods yield valid results but may lead to different numerical outcomes. The distinction between time constants and periods is clarified, underscoring their roles in system response and cycle duration, respectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular velocity and its units (rad/sec)
  • Familiarity with natural frequency and its calculation
  • Knowledge of time constants in dynamic systems
  • Basic concepts of periodic motion and cycles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of time constants from natural frequency in hydraulic systems
  • Study the differences between radians and cycles in frequency analysis
  • Explore the implications of using different units in system response analysis
  • Learn about the mathematical relationship between time constants and periods in oscillatory systems
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and students studying dynamics, particularly those involved in hydraulic systems and control theory, will benefit from this discussion.

ahunter10
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Here is a link to page in a book which contains an example problem:

http://imgur.com/OPrlw.jpg"

In the book, they work out the natural frequency of a hydraulic cylinder and come out with an answer in rad/sec. This number is then inverted to get a time constant, and the resultant unit is seconds.

I understand that a radian is dimensionless, and 1 rad/sec really equals 1/sec. So, it makes sense that you invert it and get seconds. However, you would also get seconds if you first convert the frequency from rad/sec to cycle/sec, and then invert.

My question is: how do you know which to use? When do you want to use sec/cycle, vs. sec/rad? It seems ambiguous, and the numbers would come out very differently.

I know the result of this equation is in radians. What if you experimentally measured the natural frequency in cycles/sec, and then inverted to get the time constant in seconds? You would get a different answer, but I don't think anything was done wrong.

Can anyone shed some light on this? I think I am missing something.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think you may be confusing a "time constant" vs. a "period." One is a parameter which is indicitive of a system's response, the other is the length of time for one cycle.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_constant

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Period_(physics )
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
955
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
601
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
19K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K