The ghost rad unit in angular motion

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stefano77
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
stefano77
Messages
20
Reaction score
8
unit of measurement '' rad '' appears and disappears as in calculating angular frequency as square root of k/m in spring-mass model.how can l explain to students?not as a dogma? you can say unit of measuremnt is the inverse of second, but what about the final formula of rad/ s ? rad appears in final result as a ghost
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To put it slightly differently: The unit of rad is equal to 1, dimensionless. Angles are dimensionless and therefore must be measured in dimensionless units. Another unit of angle is the degree, which is ##\pi/180## - still dimensionless.

We write out these units for convenience and for showing that we are dealing with an angle.
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21, Gavran and Lnewqban
stefano77 said:
unit of measurement '' rad '' appears and disappears as in calculating angular frequency as square root of k/m in spring-mass model.how can l explain to students?not as a dogma? you can say unit of measuremnt is the inverse of second, but what about the final formula of rad/ s ? rad appears in final result as a ghost
You can omit specifying radians, but you can not omit specifying degrees.

## \sin(2\pi\,rad) ## has the same value as ## \sin(2\pi) ## while ## \sin60\,^\circ ## does not have the same value as ## \sin60 ##

for angular velocity
## 2\pi\,rad/s ## has the same value as ## 2\pi\,1/s ## while ## 60\,^\circ/s ## does not have the same value as ## 60\,1/s ##
 
The radian is a unit, but it's not a dimension. Compare this to something like the meter, which is both a unit and a dimension.

The same issue that arises with the radian also arises with all other dimensionless units. Take for example the revolution. A disc of circumference 2.0 m spins at a rate of 3.0 rotations per second. How fast is a point on its rim moving? You multiply 2.0 m by 3.0 rotations per second and get a result of 6.0 m/s. How did the unit rotation disappear?
 
Mister T said:
A disc of circumference 2.0 m spins at a rate of 3.0 rotations per second.
Confusingly the dimensionless something affects what unit is used for something/second: Hertz vs. Becquerel.
 
Last edited:
A.T. said:
Confusingly the dimensionless something affects what unit is used for something/second: Hertz vs. Becquerel.
I never thought about it before, but perhaps that confusion is another layer that conflates the confusion over the use of the radian.