Riccati Equation. Unsure what substitution to use

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Trestal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Substitution
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Riccati equation y' = y^2 + x^2 and the process of linearizing it through substitution. The substitution y(x) = -(1/f(x))*(df/dx) transforms the equation into a second-order linear ordinary differential equation (ODE) given by (d²f/dx²) + x²f(x) = 0. The solution involves using Bessel functions, specifically f = c1 x^1/2 J 1/4 (1/2 x^2) + c2 x^1/2 J -1/4 (1/2 x^2). To revert to the original function y, one must differentiate f and substitute back into y = -f'/f, resulting in a fraction that combines Bessel functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riccati equations
  • Familiarity with ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Knowledge of Bessel functions
  • Proficiency in differentiation and substitution techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of Bessel functions
  • Learn techniques for solving second-order linear ODEs
  • Explore the method of power series for differential equations
  • Investigate the relationship between Riccati equations and linear ODEs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with differential equations, particularly those dealing with Riccati equations and their linearization techniques.

Trestal
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have the equation
y' = y^2 + x^2 and am asked to linearise the equation with the appropriate substitution and then solve the resulting 2nd order linear equation.

My issue is I am unsure what to substitute in for y. I can't seem to find a choice for y which the differential will be a higher order so that I can make the aux equation to solve for some value c.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hl!

Let y(x) = -(1/f(x))*(df/dx)
leads to (d²f/dx²)+x²f(x)=0
 
once you have the second order linear ODE, how do you solve it and then get back to the original Riccati equation? I tried power series method but it looks messy and I'm not sure if it's right, I then tried expressing as a Bessel function and get f= c1 x^1/2 J 1/4 (1/2 x^2) + c2 x^1/2 J -1/4 (1/2 x^2), but then how to return to a function in y?
 
Going back to the power series soln, I get a soln for f, then I differentiated f and then substituted it all back into y = -1 f'/f to get a soln for y. The soln for y has power series on numerator and denominator and have different powers of x thru it.
 
Hi !
I agree with your result :
f= c1 x^1/2 J 1/4 (1/2 x^2) + c2 x^1/2 J -1/4 (1/2 x^2)
To return to a function in y, you have to derivate f(x) and bring it back into y = -f'/f
This will leads to a fraction in which the numerator and the denominator are the sum of Bessel fonctions. This is the simplest way to express the result on a closed form.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
524
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K