What are some recommended introductory books on group theory for physicists?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on recommended introductory books on group theory for physicists, particularly for those at the graduate or senior undergraduate level. Key recommendations include Wu Ki Tung's book, which emphasizes Lie groups in high energy physics, and Brian Hall's text on representation theory, noted for its clarity. Additionally, Axler's "Linear Algebra Done Right" is suggested for those needing a refresher on linear algebra concepts. S.J. Joshua's "Symmetry Principles and Magnetic Symmetry in Solid State Physics" is also highlighted as an effective precursor to Tinkham's "Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics," which is favored for its gentle introduction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts
  • Familiarity with basic group theory
  • Knowledge of quantum mechanics principles
  • Interest in condensed matter physics applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Read Wu Ki Tung's "Group Theory in a Nutshell for Physicists"
  • Explore Brian Hall's "Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Some of Their Applications"
  • Study S.J. Joshua's "Symmetry Principles and Magnetic Symmetry in Solid State Physics"
  • Review Tinkham's "Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics" after foundational texts
USEFUL FOR

Graduate students in physics, researchers in condensed matter physics, and anyone seeking to understand the application of group theory in quantum mechanics.

dipole
Messages
553
Reaction score
149
Hi, I'm interested in doing some self-study this summer and learning some group theory. This has come up a lot as I'm getting into graduate level physics courses, so I'd like a good solid introduction to it.

Any recommendations on a book? Preferably one that's at the level of an introductory graduate level/senior undergraduate text.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wu Ki Tung's book in the '80s is the one I like most. You should consider it.
 
Brian Hall's book on representation theory is very nice, very easy to read.
 
Thanks I'll check them out. I should point out that I'm a bit rusty on my linear algebra.
 
In that case, I also recommend Axler's Linear algebra done right. It works with complex vector spaces from the start, introduces linear transformations very early, is a bit more "proofy" than most introductory texts, and doesn't spend a lot of time on how to solve systems of linear equations, applications to geometry, etc. So it's great for people who have studied linear algebra before but have forgotten a lot.
 
What are your interests?

Wu Ki Tung is heavy on Lie groups for high energy/particle physics.

Tinkham is weighted towards solid state and atomic and molecular...

Both give very good intros provided you have the requisite math.
 
Dr Transport said:
What are your interests?

Wu Ki Tung is heavy on Lie groups for high energy/particle physics.

Tinkham is weighted towards solid state and atomic and molecular...

Both give very good intros provided you have the requisite math.

My interest is learning how group theory applies to condensed matter physics and quantum mechanics in general. Eventually I'd be interested in learning how it all leads into topology.

By Tinkham are you referring to, "Group theory and Quantum Mechanics"? If so, I actually already checked this book out of the library since it seemed like a gentle introduction compared to some of the other books I found there.
 
dipole said:
My interest is learning how group theory applies to condensed matter physics and quantum mechanics in general. Eventually I'd be interested in learning how it all leads into topology.

By Tinkham are you referring to, "Group theory and Quantum Mechanics"? If so, I actually already checked this book out of the library since it seemed like a gentle introduction compared to some of the other books I found there.

I would look for a copy of S.J. Joshua, Symmetry Principles and Magnetic Symmetry in Solid State Physics and work thru that first. I took a course from Tinkham's book during my first stint in graduate school and didn't do very well. When I went back, I found Joshua and did it from cover to cover (it has solutions in the back to check your work). I then redid Tinkham and I was much more successful in retaining the material which was very useful in my dissertation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
660
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K