Answer Geometric Optics Problem: Find Reflection Angle for Index > 1.42

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a geometric optics problem related to total internal reflection in an optical fiber, specifically addressing the conditions under which total internal reflection occurs when the index of refraction exceeds 1.42. Participants are exploring the implications of the critical angle and the relationships between angles of incidence and reflection.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are calculating the critical angle and discussing the implications of varying angles of incidence. There are attempts to apply Snell's law and derive relationships between angles to understand the conditions for total internal reflection.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing hints and guidance on how to approach the problem. Some are questioning the relationships between angles and the significance of the index of refraction, while others are attempting to clarify their understanding of the equations involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on deriving the minimum index of refraction necessary for total internal reflection, and participants are navigating through the implications of their calculations and the relationships between angles in the context of the problem.

leolaw
Messages
85
Reaction score
1
Hey guys! I need some helps on an optics problem. It is from Giancoli Chapter 23, question 41:
Question:
A beam of light enters the end of an optic fiber (attachment B). Show that we can guarantee total internal reflection at the side surface of the material (at point a), if the index of refraction is greater than about 1.42. In other words, regardless of the angle [tex]\alpha[/tex], the light beam reflects back into the material at point a.

I start by calculating the critical angle in the material (see attachment A), which is 45.233. But then I am not sure how to do the next step cause i don't seem to know what I am looking for.

Can someone just help out? Thx
 

Attachments

  • B.jpg
    B.jpg
    22.9 KB · Views: 1,279
  • A.jpg
    A.jpg
    33.8 KB · Views: 1,311
Physics news on Phys.org
Total internal reflection occurs if the angle of the reflected beam is 90° or parallel to the refracting/reflecting plane between the two media.

The critical angle is calculated from [tex]\theta_c = sin^{-1}( \frac{1}{n})[/tex]

Now, since n must be bigger then 1.42 you know that [tex]\frac{1}{sin( \theta_c)} > 1,42[/tex] and thus [tex]sin( \theta_c) < 0.714[/tex]

The angle gamma MUST BE BIGGER then the critical angle theta_c which is about 45.6°

Since the gamma = 90° - beta you have that 90° - beta > 45.6 and thus 44.4 > beta.

Applying Snell's law for alpha and beta clearly shows that this upper limt for beta is indeed easy to reach by varying alpha...

marlon
 
Hint: Realize the the smallest angle of incidence at the side surface ([itex]\gamma[/itex]) will occur when [itex]\alpha[/itex] equals 90 degrees. Apply Snell's law twice: once at the end surface; once at the side surface (assuming the critical angle). Combine those two equations and you can solve for n.
 
marlon said:
Applying Snell's law for alpha and beta clearly shows that this upper limt for beta is indeed easy to reach by varying alpha...

marlon

So I have [tex]\gamma > 44.77[/tex], and [tex]\beta > 45.23[/tex], but now i don't understand what do you mean by the upper limit.

How do you find it, like what equation do i have to graph on the calculator in order to find the limit?

We have [tex]n_1 = 1 n_2> 1.42 , \alpha_1 = \alpha, \alpha_2 = 45.23[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Much better than graphing would be to derive the minimum index of refraction that would guarantee total internal reflection at the side surface. (Follow the hints in my last post.)
 
Leo, as a matter of fact Doc Al is right. It is indeed better to follow the 'other way around' approach

marlon
 
Using Snell's Law, I have these two equations:
The one on the side, (1)(sin 90) = (n)(sin gamma)
and the other one on the surface that ensure to have total internal reflection is,
(sin gamma) = 1/n.

when I combine these two equations, i have (sin 90) = n/n .
I am kind of lost here
 
Careful: The equation at the end surface should be [itex]1 = n \sin\beta[/itex]. Combine that with [itex]1 = n \sin\gamma[/itex] at the side surface.

What's the relationship between [itex]\beta[/itex] and [itex]\gamma[/itex]? Hint: use a trig identity to eliminate those angles.
 
After combing these two equations, I have [tex]1 = \frac{sin \beta}{sin \gamma}[/tex], which shows me that [tex]\beta = \gamma[/tex]
 
  • #10
Look at the diagram. [itex]\beta[/itex] and [itex]\gamma[/itex] are part of the same right triangle.
 
  • #11
Sorry that I may be asking dumb question, but then how does 1.42 play in this part?
So now i have:
[tex]n_{air} * sin(\alpha) = n_{water} * sin (45)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Keep going until you solve for n, and then you'll see. There are several ways to go. Here's what I wanted you to deduce from my last post: Since [itex]\beta[/itex] and [itex]\gamma[/itex] add to 90 degrees, then [itex]\sin\beta = \cos\gamma[/itex]. You take it from here.
 
  • #13
Got it, thx
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K