What speed is required for a 30-year journey to Alpha Centauri?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter texasman1979
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed Year
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the speed required for a hypothetical journey from Earth to Alpha Centauri over 30 years, focusing on the physics of acceleration and deceleration, as well as the implications of using a non-rocket propulsion system. Participants explore mathematical formulas and principles related to thrust, acceleration, and relativistic effects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a scenario of steadily accelerating to halfway to Alpha Centauri and then decelerating, seeking a formula to calculate speeds along the timeline.
  • Another participant discusses a fictional spacecraft using magnetic-based propulsion, weighing 130 metric tons, and requests educated estimates for thrust and speed from zero thrust to 1g.
  • A participant suggests using the formula for distance traveled under uniform acceleration, noting that the distance and time can be used to calculate acceleration and subsequently velocity.
  • One participant emphasizes that in space, once a speed is achieved, it will remain constant until acted upon by another force, and describes a narrative involving gravitational slingshots to achieve exit velocity.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about relating the provided mathematical principles to their specific scenario and requests clarification on how to manually calculate times and g-forces.
  • One participant mentions that at 1g constant acceleration, the journey would take 3.5 years onboard, while 5.8 years would pass on Earth due to relativistic effects, and suggests that a lower acceleration would be needed to achieve the 30-year timeline.
  • There is a discussion about the necessity of gravitational slingshots, with one participant arguing that the spacecraft's power would render them unnecessary.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the necessity of gravitational slingshots and the specifics of the calculations involved. There is no consensus on the best approach to relate the mathematical principles to the fictional scenario presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of using metric units for calculations and the potential impact of relativistic effects at high speeds, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Writers of science fiction, enthusiasts of space travel physics, and individuals interested in the mathematical modeling of interstellar journeys may find this discussion relevant.

texasman1979
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
related to my other thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=732462

Here's the hypothetical scenario:

A trip from Earth to alpha centauri in 30 years. Steadily accelerating to half way then turning around and steadily decelerating.

Trying to figure out a way to figure speeds along the time line.

I don't want the answer, but the math formula to figure it out.

Thx.

30 years -- time line
4.2 lightyears -- relative distance to stars
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
calc thrust non rocket engine

related to my other thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=732459

Writing a fiction scifi book.

The spacecraft will have a magnetic based propulsion system. In the book the spacecraft weighs 130 metric tons.

I would like some educated numbers to go by for figuring thrust and speed from 0 thrust to 1g.

Obviously, with a non rocket type propulsion there would be no mass loss as fuel is burned cause there wouldn't be any fuel. So i don't divulge too much of the story line pretend it is solar based energy making electricity making a magnetic field.

This is a book I'm writing, but there is some real science behind it and I'm wanting it to be as real as it can be.

Thx.
 
I merged your threads, as the questions are closely related. This is not really astrophysics, so the thread could get moved.

For a uniform acceleration "a", starting at rest, and neglecting relativistic effects, the distance traveled after time t is given by ##s=\frac{1}{2} a t^2##. You know t and s (half the distance and time), so you can calculate a. With that, the velocity is just acceleration*time.
The deceleration part works the same way, just backwards.
I would like some educated numbers to go by for figuring thrust and speed from 0 thrust to 1g.
F=m*a
Calculate a, and you can get F.
What is a "magnetic based propulsion system"? You have to accelerate something backwards. Mass from the rocket, mass or light incoming from some external source, or interstellar medium. You do need fuel to power your ship - even if you have a system that does not need reaction mass.
 
Last edited:
two parts to this.

In space, once you are going 1,000,000 miles per hour you are going to continue going 1,000,000 miles per hour till some force acts to modify that.

In my story and inventor makes a new type of ship set in the next few decades. As far as the details to that, you'll have to read the book. :)

So, a 30 year trip to Alpha Centauri, binary star system. The character and his craft will begin in Earth's orbit and sling shot around a couple planets to achieve system exit velocity. Then he will continue to accelerate toward Alpha Centauri for 15 years and then turn around and decelerate the next 15 years.

At the same time the ship weighs 130 metric tons. That's 286600.6 pounds. How many pounds of thrust would be needed to gain 1 gforce from the acceleration?

I am having a bit of trouble relating your math with the principles I have stated. I would help me a great deal if you related the math to my particular problem so i can relate the two better.

thx.
 
texasman1979 said:
I am having a bit of trouble relating your math with the principles I have stated. I would help me a great deal if you related the math to my particular problem so i can relate the two better.

the ship weighs 130 metric tons
That's the m in F=ma. Convert to kilograms.
1 gforce from the acceleration?
that's the acceleration a(use the value in m/s^2)
Plug these in and you get the force(thrust) in Newtons.

Same with s=at^2. s is half the distance to αCen in metres; a is the acceleration you're looking for; t is the time to get half way there, in seconds. Just plug the values in.

By the way, at 1g constant acceleration, you'll get there in 3.5 years on-board time, and 5.8 Earth time, as relativistic effects start to play a role at that speeds.
To get there in 30 years, you need about 0.02 g acceleration(here, relativistic effects are negligible).

You may find these resourses useful:
http://www.projectrho.com/rocket/calculators.php
in particular this one:
http://mysite.verizon.net/res148h4j/javascript/script_starship.html
 
how did you come up with those times and g forces? that web page?

how do i figure that manually?
 
texasman1979 said:
So, a 30 year trip to Alpha Centauri, binary star system. The character and his craft will begin in Earth's orbit and sling shot around a couple planets to achieve system exit velocity.
That is not necessary, your ship is so powerful it would be a waste of time (several years) to use gravitational slingshots within our solar system for a tiny velocity gain.

I am having a bit of trouble relating your math with the principles I have stated. I would help me a great deal if you related the math to my particular problem so i can relate the two better.
I considered all those principles for the formulas and explanations I posted.Metric units are much more convenient.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K