Determine the car's acceleration when t=4sec. ANS: 1.06 m/sec^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter jjiimmyy101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining a car's acceleration at t=4 seconds, given an acceleration function of a=(3s^-1/3)m/sec^2. The user starts from the equation a = d^2s/dt^2 and attempts to integrate it to find the position function s. Through integration, they derive the velocity function v and subsequently the position function s, ultimately calculating the acceleration to be 1.06 m/sec^2 at t=4 seconds. A request for clarification on a specific integration step indicates a desire for deeper understanding of the calculus involved. The conversation highlights the application of calculus in solving motion problems.
jjiimmyy101
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Problem: A car starts from rest and moves along a straight line with an acceleration of a=(3s^-1/3)m/sec^2, where s is in metres. Determine the car's acceleration when t=4sec. ANS: 1.06 m/sec^2

Alright...I know nothing about integrals...really, nothing. I was never taught anything about integrals even though I've taken calculus courses before.

Here's what I think I should do.

Take the equation a = d^2s/dt^2 and INTEGRATE it to find the position (s) and then substitute back into original equation. But how do you do this.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If u want to taste calculus here it goes then

Now a=\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{dv*ds}{ds*dt}=\frac{vdv}{ds}=3s^{-\frac{1}{3}}

vdv=3s^{-\frac{1}{3}} ds
integrate u wll get v^2=9s^{\frac{2}{3}}+c

From conditions given c=0
therefore v^2=9s^{\frac{2}{3}}
Now v=3s^{\frac{1}{3}}

v=ds/dt

so we again have

s^{-\frac{1}{3}} ds = 3dt
Again integrating u get
\int s^{-\frac{1}{3}} ds = \int 3dt
u get
\frac{3}{2} s^{\frac{2}{3}}=3t+c

From the given conditions c=0
so we have
s^{\frac{2}{3}}=2t

So at t=4, s=8^{\frac{3}{2}}

and hence acceleration a= 38^{-\frac{1}{3}} = 1.06
 
Last edited:
Thank-you.

I'll apologize before I even ask.
Sorry.

I know you integrated, but could you show me in more detail how you went from v*dv = 3*s^-1/3*ds
to
v^2 = 9*s^2/3 + c
 
It is a basic formula

\int x^n dx = \frac{x^{n+1}}{n+1}
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top