MHB 10.1 are linear independent ....

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
show that
$e^{2x},\quad \sin 2x$
are linear independent on
$\left\{-\infty,\infty\right\}$

new concept to me
but
$\sin 2x$
has an amplitude
$e^{2x}$
doesn't
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whether or not a "vector" has an "amplitude" is not relevant. All we require in a vector space is that we be able to add vectors and multiply vectors by numbers (more generally, "scalars").

Two vectors, u and v, in a vector space are "independent" if the only values or a and b such that au+ bv= 0 are a= b= 0. Here that gives us the equation ae^{2x}+ bsin(2x)= 0 for all x. In particular, if x= 0 that becomes a(1)+ b(0)= a= 0 and, if x= \pi/2, ae^{\pi/2}+ bsin(\pi/2)= 0 which, since a= 0, gives b= 0.
 
SSCwt.png
 
Last edited:
?? That appears to be impossible to read!
 
.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'How to define vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K