MHB 10.2 Determine if the set of vectors form a vector space

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on determining whether the set of vectors of the form $\begin{bmatrix} x\\y\\5 \end{bmatrix}$ in $\Bbb{R}^3$ forms a vector space. It is concluded that this set is not closed under addition since the third component sums to 15, indicating it does not satisfy the requirements for a subspace. The conversation also touches on the relationship between vector spaces and subspaces, affirming that subspaces are indeed vector spaces themselves. A hypothetical scenario is raised about changing the third component to zero, which would allow closure under addition and multiplication. Overall, the set of vectors does not form a vector space due to the constant third component.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Determine if the set of vectors
$\begin{bmatrix}
x\\y\\5
\end{bmatrix}\in \Bbb{R}^3$
form a vector space
ok if I follow the book example I think this is what is done
$\begin{bmatrix} x_1\\y_2\\5 \end{bmatrix}
+\begin{bmatrix} x_2\\y_2\\5 \end{bmatrix}
+\begin{bmatrix} x_2\\y_2\\5 \end{bmatrix}
=\begin{bmatrix} x_1+x_2+x_3\\y_1+y_2+y_3\\15 \end{bmatrix}$
since the third entry is 15, the set of such vectors is not closed under addition and hence is not a subspaceI assume in this case a vector space and sub space are the same.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Right: sub spaces are by definition vector spaces in their own right. Your proof looks good to me! What if the third component was zero?
 
well if the 3rd conponent is zero then everying is just on the same plane
so multiplication or addition would close

well i think anyway?
 
Didn't you post this question somewhere else many moons ago? I could swear that I responded to this one at some point in the past.

-Dan
 
I don't think so

But I took linear Algebra a year ago it might be very similar..

They combined the LA and De class
Not sure why.

I mark the homework probs I go to MHB for help with the MHB logo to avoid dbb.

But I post a lot since I'm very deaf and classroom is nil to me.

Sorry I'm probably overload here
 
It wasn't a criticism. I was just wondering.

-Dan
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K