1D Green function for a charged layer

In summary, the conversation discusses finding the Green function for a charged layer using boundary conditions. The linear form of the Green function is determined by solving for constants based on the given boundary conditions. However, in the case of the boundary condition $\phi \rightarrow 0$ as $x \rightarrow -\infty$, the linear function does not disappear. The final solution for the Green's function is $G(x,x') = 4\pi (x_{<} - x')$, satisfying both boundary conditions.
  • #1
sergiokapone
302
17
Homework Statement
Find 1D Green function for charged layer with distribution:
\begin{equation}
\phi=
\begin{cases}
0, x<-a \\
-\rho_0, -a<x<0 \\
\rho_0, 0<x<a \\
0, x>a
\end{cases}
\end{equation}

With boundary condition ##\phi(x \to -\infty) = 0##.
Relevant Equations
##\nabla^2\phi = -4\pi\rho## and ##\nabla^2G(x,x') = -4\pi\delta(x-x')##
I came across an example of a solution to finding the potential of a charged layer using the Green function (here, pdf). The standard algorithm for finding the Green function by boundary conditions for many problems is understandable:
\begin{align*}
G_\mathrm{Left} = Ax+ B \\
G_\mathrm{Right} = Cx + D \\
G_\mathrm{Right}' - G_\mathrm{Left}' = -4\pi
\end{align*}
since the Green function is linear in 1D problems, then using boundary conditions we find constants that are functions of primed coordinates:But in this case I cannot understand how to find the Green function (how to determine constants) by the boundary condition ##\phi(x \to -\infty) = 0##, which, as indicated in the link, is equal ##G(x,x') = 4\pi x_{<}##. After all, the linear function does not disappear when striving to infinity. So, I need help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A:The boundary condition $\phi \rightarrow 0$ as $x \rightarrow -\infty$ is telling you that the potential goes to zero at large negative values of $x$. This means that the Green's function must also go to zero in this limit, so you must have a solution of the form$$G(x,x') = 4\pi (x_{<} - x_0),$$where $x_0$ is some constant. Note that when $x \rightarrow -\infty$, we have $x_{<} \rightarrow x'$ and so this solution satisfies the boundary condition. The other boundary condition that you need to satisfy is continuity of the Green's function at $x = x'$. This means that you must have$$G(x',x') = 4\pi(x' - x_0) = 0.$$This implies that $x_0 = x'$, so the final solution for the Green's function is$$G(x,x') = 4\pi (x_{<} - x').$$
 

1. What is a 1D Green function for a charged layer?

A 1D Green function for a charged layer is a mathematical function that describes the electric potential generated by a charged layer in one-dimensional space. It takes into account the charge distribution and the dielectric properties of the layer.

2. How is the 1D Green function for a charged layer derived?

The 1D Green function for a charged layer is derived using the method of images, where a fictitious charge is introduced to satisfy the boundary conditions at the interface between the layer and the surrounding medium. This allows for the calculation of the electric potential at any point in space.

3. What is the significance of the 1D Green function for a charged layer?

The 1D Green function for a charged layer is important in many areas of physics and engineering, including electrostatics, electromagnetism, and semiconductor device modeling. It allows for the accurate calculation of electric potential and charge distribution in systems with charged layers.

4. How does the 1D Green function for a charged layer differ from the 3D Green function?

The 1D Green function for a charged layer is a simplified version of the 3D Green function, which describes electric potential in three-dimensional space. The 1D Green function only takes into account variations in one direction, while the 3D Green function takes into account variations in all three directions.

5. Can the 1D Green function for a charged layer be used for non-uniform charge distributions?

Yes, the 1D Green function for a charged layer can be used for non-uniform charge distributions by dividing the layer into smaller segments and using the principle of superposition to calculate the overall electric potential. This is known as the method of moments and is commonly used in practical applications.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
135
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
999
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
273
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top