Can not find correct green's function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding the correct Green's function for a long wire with a constant charge density placed inside a grounded cylindrical metal housing. The relevant equation is Δf=-(μ/ε0)*∂^2(r), where μ represents linear charge density and ε0 is the vacuum permittivity. The proposed Green's function is G(r,r0)=(1/2*pi)*ln|r-r0|, applicable in two dimensions without boundary conditions. The user expresses difficulty in applying separation of variables, indicating a preference for the Green's function approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Green's functions in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with Laplace's equation and the Laplace operator (Δ)
  • Knowledge of cylindrical coordinates and boundary conditions
  • Basic concepts of electrostatics, including charge density and potential
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Green's functions in electrostatics
  • Learn about solving Laplace's equation in cylindrical coordinates
  • Explore the method of separation of variables for boundary value problems
  • Investigate the implications of boundary conditions on Green's functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those focused on electrostatics, boundary value problems, and mathematical methods in physics.

t387
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have long wire with constant charge density that is put inside a grounded metal housing with a shape of cylindrical section (a ≤ r ≤ b and 0 ≤ ϕ ≤ α). We need to find potential inside the box.

2. Homework Equations

Δf=-(μ/ε0)*∂^2(r), where μ is linear charge density [As/m], ε0 is Vacuum permittivity, f is the potential (Δ is laplace operator) and ∂^2(r) is two-dimensional delta function.

f (a ≤ r ≤ b and 0 ≤ ϕ ≤ α) = 0

green's function for ΔG =∂^2(r),two dimensions and no boundary conditions:

G(r,r0)=(1/2*pi)*ln|r-r0|

The Attempt at a Solution



I am trying to solve the problem with green's function since it seems that solving this problem with separation of variables is too complicated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
t387 said:
I am trying to solve the problem with green's function
Please show what you have attempted so far
 
Apart from what @Dale said, can you argue for why you think this is more difficult to solve using orthogonal functions?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K