1s orbital overlaps with the nucleus, why don't they interact?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rumborak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nucleus Orbital
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interactions between the 1s orbital of a hydrogen atom and its nucleus. While the electron cloud and nucleus overlap significantly, interactions are primarily electromagnetic, forming the 1s orbital. Electron capture is mentioned as a radioactive decay process where the nucleus absorbs an inner shell electron, though this does not occur in hydrogen due to energy constraints. The conversation also highlights the impact of the nucleus's finite size on energy levels and degeneracy in hydrogen, emphasizing the complexity of these interactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and the Schrödinger equation
  • Familiarity with atomic structure, specifically hydrogen atom properties
  • Knowledge of electron capture and radioactive decay processes
  • Concept of wave functions and radial probability distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of finite nuclear size on atomic energy levels
  • Study the principles of electron capture in radioactive isotopes
  • Explore the differences between electron and muon interactions in hydrogen-like atoms
  • Learn about internal conversion and its role in nuclear-electron interactions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, chemists, and students of quantum mechanics seeking to deepen their understanding of atomic interactions and the nuances of electron behavior in hydrogen atoms.

rumborak
Messages
706
Reaction score
154
Granted, the size difference between a hydrogen atom's electron cloud and its nucleus is a factor of one million (~1Å vs ~10^-6Å), but that's still a significant amount of overlap that, I would think, would trigger the occasional interaction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They do interact, in most considerations indeed the nucleus is treated merely as a point and hence dimensionless charge. But if more accurate energy levels are desired, various corrections, usually treated as perturbations, must be incorporated into the Schroedinger equation. The one that pertains the finite size of the nucleus is the volume effect.
 
Indeed they do. Electron capture is a type of radioactive decay where the nucleus absorbs an inner shell electron. This doesn't happen in hydrogen because it isn't energetically favorable; the resulting neutron has more mass than the hydrogen atom.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Radioactive isotopes that decay by pure electron capture can be inhibited from radioactive decay if they are fully ionized ("stripped" is sometimes used to describe such ions). It is hypothesized that such elements, if formed by the r-process in exploding supernovae, are ejected fully ionized and so do not undergo radioactive decay as long as they do not encounter electrons in outer space.

That. Is. So. Cool.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
But if more accurate energy levels are desired

To expand on this, the effect also changes the number of energy levels for the hydrogen atom, not just their value. There is the well-known k-l degeneracy, where the n=2 l=0 level has the same energy as the n=2 l=1 level. But because the l = 0 level spends more time "inside" the nucleus, it has a larger energy shift than the l=1 state, breaking the degeneracy.
 
phyzguy said:
Indeed they do. Electron capture is a type of radioactive decay where the nucleus absorbs an inner shell electron.

cool, learn something new every day :)
 
If you, like I, have a stack of "Scientific American" gathering dust on your shelves, you might find it interesting to read or re-read this article: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-proton-radius-puzzle/

As I recall, part of it talks about how the electron wave function overlaps the proton wave function differently than the muon does in muonic hydrogen. It is offered up as a possible explanation of why the proton radius appears to be different when muons are substituted for electrons in one method for measuring the the proton radius.
 
You probably mean react , not interact.
The hydrogen atom is produced by electron-proton interaction.
 
I would think the previous discussion in this thread indicates that I was indeed talking about interaction between the electron's wave function and the proton's, not just a chemistry consideration. I was wondering why, if the the highest probability of an 1s electron is smack in the middle of the nucleus, why there aren't obvious interactions between the two. As was indicated in the replies here, there are indeed interactions resulting from that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #10
rumborak said:
the the highest probability of an 1s electron is smack in the middle of the nucleus
It seems like you forget that the radial probability of a hydrogen-like atom is given by ##r^2|\psi_{nl}(r)|^2##, the presence of ##r^2## makes the probability inevitably zero in the origin and the maximum is shifted to a further distance.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu and davenn
  • #11
rumborak said:
Granted, the size difference between a hydrogen atom's electron cloud and its nucleus is a factor of one million (~1Å vs ~10^-6Å), but that's still a significant amount of overlap that, I would think, would trigger the occasional interaction.

I don't understand what you mean by an interaction. The way I look at it the interaction between the electron and the nucleus is what forms the 1s orbital, so as long as that orbital exists there's an interaction at all times.

On the other hand, if by interaction you mean "occupy the same place at the same time" then you are asking a question that can't be answered because the electron can't be located that precisely.

But on the other hand if you're asking if there are other interactions besides the electromagnetic interaction that forms the 1s orbital, then the answer is yes and other posters have provided that answer.
 
  • #12

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K