MHB 2.3.17 Find the average acceleration for this interval.

AI Thread Summary
The average acceleration of the object between t=5 s and t=8 s is calculated using the formula a_av = (v2 - v1) / (t2 - t1), resulting in -2 m/s². The initial velocity is 5 m/s at t=5 s, and the final velocity is -1 m/s at t=8 s. While the calculation confirms the book's answer of -2 m/s², there is insufficient information to create a detailed graph of acceleration over time. The discussion highlights that only average acceleration can be determined from the given data. Therefore, the focus remains on the average value rather than the specifics of the motion's curve.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
2.3.17 At $t=5\, s$ an object is traveling at $5 \, m/s$.
At $t=8\, s$ its velocity is $-1\, m/s$
(a) Find the average acceleration for this interval.
$$a_{av}=\frac{v_2-v_1}{t_2-t_1}=\frac{\Delta v}{\Delta t}$$
So
$$a_{av}=\frac{-1-5}{8-5}=\frac{-6}{3}=-2 \, m/s$$
book answer $-2\, m/s^2$ok I think this is ok
but again was wondering if a tikx graph can be made or is acceleration a curve?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karush said:
2.3.17 At $t=5\, s$ an object is traveling at $5 \, m/s$.
At $t=8\, s$ its velocity is $-1\, m/s$
(a) Find the average acceleration for this interval.
$$a_{av}=\frac{v_2-v_1}{t_2-t_1}=\frac{\Delta v}{\Delta t}$$
So
$$a_{av}=\frac{-1-5}{8-5}=\frac{-6}{3}=-2 \, m/s$$
book answer $-2\, m/s^2$ok I think this is ok
but again was wondering if a tikx graph can be made or is acceleration a curve?
You don't have enough information to draw the actual curve. Just enough to get the average.

-Dan
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top