2 masses attached with a spring falling

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dweirdo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling Spring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

When two masses, each of mass M, are attached by a spring with constant k and initially in equilibrium, cutting the rope causes them to fall. The discussion confirms that the masses will oscillate after the rope is cut due to the spring's initial stretch, which creates a net force. The effective gravitational force acting on the system changes, leading to oscillatory motion as the spring's potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. The displacement from the new equilibrium point is calculated as mg/k, indicating that the system will indeed oscillate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of spring mechanics and Hooke's Law
  • Familiarity with oscillatory motion and potential energy concepts
  • Basic principles of equilibrium in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of oscillatory motion in spring systems
  • Learn about the energy transformations in oscillating systems
  • Explore the concept of effective gravitational force in accelerating frames
  • Investigate the dynamics of coupled oscillators and their behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students studying classical mechanics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of oscillating systems involving springs and masses.

Dweirdo
Messages
174
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2 balls, each of mass M, are attached to each other by a spring with constant k.
they hanged out by a rope, so they are in equilibrium, the rope was cut and they fall.
do they Oscillate?


Homework Equations


effective g=g-a (vectors) when a=g, effective g=0.
Fnet=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


now my opinion is split here, from 1 point of view they both fall with acceleration g, so they shouldn't oscillate (that's based on logic) its like throwing a bottle with a hole in it, and no water will come out of the bottle , but on the other hand,the spring was stretched initially, and if m falls with acceleration g, the net force on it should be Fnet=mg, but in this case it's not, the spring is stretched so there is a force upwards(looking at the lower mass) and mg down , so what's the answer, will it?
thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When it is at rest and you displace it from equilibrium and release it what does it do?

When it is hanging is there any displacement from equilibrium?

When it is cut what displacement from the new equilibrium point are the weights from each other?
 
At last a reply! :D
thanks, ok so here is what i think:
LowlyPion said:
When it is at rest and you displace it from equilibrium and release it what does it do?
It oscillates.
LowlyPion said:
When it is hanging is there any displacement from equilibrium?
NO.
LowlyPion said:
When it is cut what displacement from the new equilibrium point are the weights from each other?
first, the equilibrium point will be when the spring is not stretched at all right?(when its cut i mean)
so the displacement is the Xo which is mg/k imo, the initial stretch .
but the displacement of each mass is different? :S so its mg/2k
Am I right?
I'll wait for your answers, If the above is true I think I can solve it using reduced mass :X

well Thank You, waiting for reply.
Dweirdo
 
Last edited:
Dweirdo said:
When it is hanging is there any displacement from equilibrium?

NO.

Are you sure? There is displacement from the relaxed un weighted state of the spring.

F = m*g = k*Δx

Δx = m*g/k

If there is displacement then there is potential energy = 1/2*k*x2
Won't that energy cause something to happen?

If g suddenly goes to 0, then won't Δx need to go to 0?

In what way is that all that different from displacing a mass and releasing it?
 
wait,
when both mass hang on a rope, they are in equilibrium :S no? so there is no displacement from equilibrium.
or did you mean to ask if the spring stretched?
so the equilibrium point changes, thus it's not in equilibrium anymore ,so it should oscillate ? no?
ty
 
Dweirdo said:
wait,
when both mass hang on a rope, they are in equilibrium :S no? so there is no displacement from equilibrium.
or did you mean to ask if the spring stretched?
so the equilibrium point changes, thus it's not in equilibrium anymore ,so it should oscillate ? no?
ty

Yes it should oscillate.

I expanded what I posted in the previous post a bit, which I guess you missed.
 
[
LowlyPion said:
Yes it should oscillate.

I expanded what I posted in the previous post a bit, which I guess you missed.

Yes, missed the energy part :}
so it will, ok thanks.
and i treat it as 2 masses on an horizontal table?
 
Dweirdo said:
Yes, missed the energy part :}
so it will, ok thanks.
and i treat it as 2 masses on an horizontal table?

As to the oscillation itself, yes it should behave the same I would think ... until it hits of course.
 
Yes of course, I would suspect it would oscillate after hitting the ground XD
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
982
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K