2 masses attached with a spring falling

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dweirdo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling Spring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two masses attached by a spring, initially in equilibrium while hanging from a rope. Upon cutting the rope, the question arises whether the masses will oscillate as they fall. The discussion centers around the dynamics of the system and the effects of gravitational acceleration on the spring's behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the spring's initial stretch and the forces acting on the masses as they fall. Questions are raised about the nature of equilibrium and displacement from equilibrium when the rope is cut.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored regarding the equilibrium state of the system and the potential for oscillation. Some participants suggest that the initial stretch of the spring and the forces involved may lead to oscillatory motion, while others question the definitions of equilibrium in this context.

Contextual Notes

There is some ambiguity regarding the definitions of equilibrium and displacement, particularly in relation to the spring's behavior when the masses are released. Participants are considering the effects of gravitational forces and potential energy in their reasoning.

Dweirdo
Messages
174
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2 balls, each of mass M, are attached to each other by a spring with constant k.
they hanged out by a rope, so they are in equilibrium, the rope was cut and they fall.
do they Oscillate?


Homework Equations


effective g=g-a (vectors) when a=g, effective g=0.
Fnet=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


now my opinion is split here, from 1 point of view they both fall with acceleration g, so they shouldn't oscillate (that's based on logic) its like throwing a bottle with a hole in it, and no water will come out of the bottle , but on the other hand,the spring was stretched initially, and if m falls with acceleration g, the net force on it should be Fnet=mg, but in this case it's not, the spring is stretched so there is a force upwards(looking at the lower mass) and mg down , so what's the answer, will it?
thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When it is at rest and you displace it from equilibrium and release it what does it do?

When it is hanging is there any displacement from equilibrium?

When it is cut what displacement from the new equilibrium point are the weights from each other?
 
At last a reply! :D
thanks, ok so here is what i think:
LowlyPion said:
When it is at rest and you displace it from equilibrium and release it what does it do?
It oscillates.
LowlyPion said:
When it is hanging is there any displacement from equilibrium?
NO.
LowlyPion said:
When it is cut what displacement from the new equilibrium point are the weights from each other?
first, the equilibrium point will be when the spring is not stretched at all right?(when its cut i mean)
so the displacement is the Xo which is mg/k imo, the initial stretch .
but the displacement of each mass is different? :S so its mg/2k
Am I right?
I'll wait for your answers, If the above is true I think I can solve it using reduced mass :X

well Thank You, waiting for reply.
Dweirdo
 
Last edited:
Dweirdo said:
When it is hanging is there any displacement from equilibrium?

NO.

Are you sure? There is displacement from the relaxed un weighted state of the spring.

F = m*g = k*Δx

Δx = m*g/k

If there is displacement then there is potential energy = 1/2*k*x2
Won't that energy cause something to happen?

If g suddenly goes to 0, then won't Δx need to go to 0?

In what way is that all that different from displacing a mass and releasing it?
 
wait,
when both mass hang on a rope, they are in equilibrium :S no? so there is no displacement from equilibrium.
or did you mean to ask if the spring stretched?
so the equilibrium point changes, thus it's not in equilibrium anymore ,so it should oscillate ? no?
ty
 
Dweirdo said:
wait,
when both mass hang on a rope, they are in equilibrium :S no? so there is no displacement from equilibrium.
or did you mean to ask if the spring stretched?
so the equilibrium point changes, thus it's not in equilibrium anymore ,so it should oscillate ? no?
ty

Yes it should oscillate.

I expanded what I posted in the previous post a bit, which I guess you missed.
 
[
LowlyPion said:
Yes it should oscillate.

I expanded what I posted in the previous post a bit, which I guess you missed.

Yes, missed the energy part :}
so it will, ok thanks.
and i treat it as 2 masses on an horizontal table?
 
Dweirdo said:
Yes, missed the energy part :}
so it will, ok thanks.
and i treat it as 2 masses on an horizontal table?

As to the oscillation itself, yes it should behave the same I would think ... until it hits of course.
 
Yes of course, I would suspect it would oscillate after hitting the ground XD
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K