2016 seems long to me (Leap second)

  • Thread starter Thread starter jim mcnamara
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2016
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
Messages
4,789
Reaction score
3,854
Now I know why: http://phys.org/news/2016-12-extra_1.html
We are getting a leap second! 2016 really is too long. :cry: If you are an astronomer or programmer you know about these corrections to NIST atomic clock time (UTC). The Earth's period of rotation is not constant over long periods. Very slightly, Earth slowing down.

Programming:
The POSIX standards (for UNIX) do not require tracking leap seconds. But some OS developers have decided to keep track of them - Linux for example. GPS does not deal with them.

Here is a discussion:
https://www.wired.com/2015/01/torvalds_leapsecond/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
jim mcnamara said:
GPS does not deal with them.
Interesting, I would have assumed one second would be fairly crucial, I thought GPS even took time dilation into account. Am I missing something here. ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Oops - the second will be added to 2017, my apologies.

NIST source file for programming - leap seconds: https://github.com/eggert/tz/blob/master/leap-seconds.list

@1oldman2 - yes, gps does care about relativity. GPS depends solely on the duration (delay) of the signal until reception time. So all that matters in terms of elapsed time is that: Every satellite is on the same time precisely, and the ephemeris portrays the exact sub-satellite point Then corrections like WASD, are applied to correct for atmospheric refraction. GPS uses its own time standard, which can be converted to UTC.

There is a LOT to this that I blithely ignored. Links:
Math: http://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/cms_upload/Thompson07734.pdf
Overview: http://www.oc.nps.edu/oc2902w/gps/timsys.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2
jim mcnamara said:
@1oldman2 - yes, gps does care about relativity. GPS depends solely on the duration (delay) of the signal until reception time. So all that matters in terms of elapsed time is that: Every satellite is on the same time precisely, and the ephemeris portrays the exact sub-satellite point Then corrections like WASD, are applied to correct for atmospheric refraction. GPS uses its own time standard, which can be converted to UTC.
Thanks, sometimes this entire site could be titled "T.I.L." :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tsu
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddar...ng-nasas-sdo-adds-leap-second-to-master-clock
On Dec. 31, 2016, official clocks around the world will add a leap second just before midnight Coordinated Universal Time - which corresponds to 6:59:59 p.m. EST. NASA missions will also have to make the switch, including the Solar Dynamics Observatory, or SDO, which watches the sun 24/7.

Clocks do this to keep in sync with Earth's rotation, which gradually slows down over time. When the dinosaurs roamed Earth, for example, our globe took only 23 hours to make a complete rotation. In space, millisecond accuracy is crucial to understanding how satellites orbit.