MHB 205_o6_05 How long does it take a rock falling from rest to reach a velocity

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for a rock to reach a velocity of 25.7 m/s during free fall on a celestial body, using the equation s = 2.38t^2. The derived velocity equation is v = 4.76t, leading to the conclusion that t is approximately 5.4 seconds. Participants clarify that 's' represents displacement in meters, not seconds, and emphasize the importance of unit consistency in calculations. The conversation also touches on the use of Leibniz notation for differentiation, noting that while notation may vary, the underlying problem-solving approach remains unchanged. The key takeaway is the relationship between displacement, velocity, and time in the context of free fall.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{205_o6_05_velocity}$
The equation for a free fall at the surface of celestial body in outer space ($s$ in Meters, $t$ in seconds.)\\ is $\displaystyle s=2.38t^2$
How long does it take a rock falling from rest to reach a velocity of $\displaystyle 25.7 \frac{m}{sec}$ on this celestial body in outer space?
$s'=4.76t \\$
$25.7=4.76t\\$
$5.4sec\approx t \\$
how do you do this by $\d{s}{t}$ since s can be confused with seconds?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem says "s is in meters" so, no, anyone who was carefully reading the problem would not confuse s with seconds!
 
$s=2.38t^2$
$\d{s}{t}=4.76t\d{m}{t}$ ?
 
$s = displacement$
$v = velocity$
$a = acceleration$

Now, $s' = v \ (in \ m/s)$, and $s'' = a \ (in \ m/s^2)$, also, $v' = a$. We often go back and forth between these three, be it via differentiation or integration. It's always important to check your units though, as you are doing :).

As HallsofIvy has said, it should be obvious to the reader when 's' is used to represent the displacement, and when it is used to represent seconds. To rid yourself of any ambiguity, just do what you have already done and write 'sec'.
 
My main question was how is this shown and solved in
Leibniz notation ??
 
The notation doesn't change the way in which a problem is solved. It is merely a representation of symbols.

The only thing that changes would be your first line i guess.

$\frac{ds}{dt} = v = 4.76t$
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K