MHB 243.12.5.21 acute angle btw vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Vectors
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acute angle between two planes defined by the equations 3x + 10y + 7z = 9 and 7x + 2y + 9z = 3. The calculated angle is approximately 0.775 radians, derived using the dot product of the normal vectors of the planes. Participants clarify that the constants 9 and 3 can be ignored in the dot product since they do not affect the angle between the planes. The importance of using normal vectors for determining the angle of intersection is emphasized, as shifting the planes does not change this angle. The conversation also touches on the preference for using unit vectors in such calculations for clarity.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
\tiny{243.12.5.21}
$\textsf{Use a calculator to find the acute angle between the planes to the nearest thousandth of a radian.}$
$$\textit{$3x+10y+7z=9$ and $7x+ 2y + 9z = 3$}$$
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
u&=3x+10y+7z=9\\
v&=7x+2y+9z=3\\
u \cdot v&=3\cdot7+10\cdot2+7\cdot9\\
&=21+20+63=104\\
|u|&=\sqrt{3^2+10^2+7^2}=\sqrt{158}\\
|v|&=\sqrt{7^2+2^2+9^2}=\sqrt{134}\\
\end{align*}
$\textit{therefore}$
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
\theta&=\cos^{-1}\left[\frac{u\cdot v}{|u||v|} \right]\\
&=\cos^{-1}\left[\frac{104}
{|\sqrt{158}||\sqrt{134}|} \right]\\
W|A &=\color{red}{\textbf{$0.775$ rad}}
\end{align*}

think this is ok so any suggestions

also why can we drop the 9 and 3 for dot product?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
karush said:
\tiny{243.12.5.21}
$\textsf{Use a calculator to find the acute angle between the planes to the nearest thousandth of a radian.}$
$$\textit{$3x+10y+7z=9$ and $7x+ 2y + 9z = 3$}$$
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
u&=3x+10y+7z=9\\
v&=7x+2y+9z=3\\
u \cdot v&=3\cdot7+10\cdot2+7\cdot9\\
&=21+20+63=104\\
|u|&=\sqrt{3^2+10^2+7^2}=\sqrt{158}\\
|v|&=\sqrt{7^2+2^2+9^2}=\sqrt{134}\\
\end{align*}
$\textit{therefore}$
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
\theta&=\cos^{-1}\left[\frac{u\cdot v}{|u||v|} \right]\\
&=\cos^{-1}\left[\frac{104}
{|\sqrt{158}||\sqrt{134}|} \right]\\
W|A &=\color{red}{\textbf{$0.775$ rad}}
\end{align*}

think this is ok so any suggestions

Looks good to me, other than the absolute value bars in the last arccos(...) being unnecessary.

karush said:
also why can we drop the 9 and 3 for dot product?

$ax+by+cz=\alpha$ and $ax+by+cz=\beta$ are parallel planes (where $\alpha,\beta$ are real numbers that may be distinct),
 
karush said:
also why can we drop the 9 and 3 for dot product?

The Normal Vector to the plane is described by the three coefficients. You are finding the angle between the two Normal Vectors.

If you move one plane or the other up or down, such movement will not change the Angle of Intersection. The Line of Intersection will move.

Personally, I've never been a fan of the relatively unexplained magnitudes sneaking their way into such formulae. I always thought it wise to suggest that we should be using Unit Vectors. Anyway, unique answers don't care how you find them. :-)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K