2D Kinematics I tried so hard

lmbiango
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
2D Kinematics Please Help! I tried so hard

Relative to the ground, a car has a velocity of 17.3 m/s, directed due north. Relative to this car, a truck has a velocity of 20.5 m/s directed 48.5 ° south of east. Find the (a) magnitude and (b) direction of the truck's velocity relative to the ground. Give the directional angle relative to due east.

I got:

Vcg = 0x + 17.3y
Vtg = 20.5 cos (45) - 20.5 sin(45)

The resultant is: 14.496x + 2.804y
So, by the Pythagorean theorem, Vtg = 14.765

(But that's wrong)

And the direction would be: Inverse tangent of (2.804/14.496)

so it's 10.948 degrees

And that's wrong too.

I also tried it with adding the 20.5 sin(45) on the Vtg part, but those answers are wrong too. I don't know what to do!
 


Hi lmbiango,

lmbiango said:
Relative to the ground, a car has a velocity of 17.3 m/s, directed due north. Relative to this car, a truck has a velocity of 20.5 m/s directed 48.5 ° south of east. Find the (a) magnitude and (b) direction of the truck's velocity relative to the ground. Give the directional angle relative to due east.

I got:

Vcg = 0x + 17.3y
Vtg = 20.5 cos (45) - 20.5 sin(45)

I don't see why are you using 45 degrees here; they give a different angle in the problem.
 


you're right, that was my first dumb mistake... but even after getting the correct number for Vtg, which I now have 13.584, the angle is still incorrect. If I do, inverse tangent of (2.804/13.723) = 11.548, that is wrong for the angle and I only have one try left.
 


lmbiango said:
you're right, that was my first dumb mistake... but even after getting the correct number for Vtg, which I now have 13.584, the angle is still incorrect. If I do, inverse tangent of (2.804/13.723) = 11.548, that is wrong for the angle and I only have one try left.


Looking at your numbers, I think you might be mixing up a few numbers.

You say the answer for Vtg was 13.584, but in your inverse tangent equation you have 13.723 in the denominator. These should be the same number and I think the 13.723 is correct, so you might want to check why you have different numbers.

In the numerator of your inverse tangent you use 2.804, which was the y component you found when using the incorrect angle of 45 degrees. You need the new total y component from using 48.5 degrees.
 


you're right, thanks, I got it now!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K