2D rotation and angular momentum uncertainty

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hokhani
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
hokhani
Messages
606
Reaction score
22
TL;DR
How a quantum particle may be confined to a planar rotation?
In quantum mechanics, the uncertainty among the components of the angular momentum doesn't allow to find all the components together. However, when a quantum particle is confined to the ##xy-##plane, it seems that ##L_x## and ##L_y## are both zeros. How about the uncertainty here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Even in 3D there can be state vectors, such as the hydrogenic atom s orbitals, where all of the angular momentum components have value 0. The uncertainty relation just says that you can't form a complete basis of ##\mathcal{H}## from only vectors that have simultaneously definite ##L_x##, ##L_y## and ##L_z##.
 
hokhani said:
when a quantum particle is confined to the ##xy-##plane, it seems that ##L_x## and ##L_y## are both zeros.
No, when a quantum particle is confined to the ##x y## plane, its Hilbert space is restricted, and there aren't even any such operators as ##L_x## and ##L_y## on vectors in the restricted Hilbert space (there is only one angular momentum operator on that space, ##L_z##). So it doesn't even make sense to talk about any uncertainty relation between ##L_x## and ##L_y##.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuarkyMeson
hilbert2 said:
Even in 3D there can be state vectors, such as the hydrogenic atom s orbitals, where all of the angular momentum components have value 0. The uncertainty relation just says that you can't form a complete basis of ##\mathcal{H}## from only vectors that have simultaneously definite ##L_x##, ##L_y## and ##L_z##.
Why are we discussing the 3D case now? Anyway, in that case the uncertainty reads
$$\Delta L_x \Delta L_y \geq \frac12 |\langle [L_x,L_y]\rangle|=\frac\hbar 2 |\langle L_z \rangle |=\frac12 \hbar^2 |m_z| $$

as you chose an s-state we have that ##\ell=0## and thus ##m_z=0## so there is no issue with ##\Delta L_x## or ##\Delta L_y## being as small as 0.
 
pines-demon said:
Why are we discussing the 3D case now? Anyway, in that case the uncertainty reads
$$\Delta L_x \Delta L_y \geq \frac12 |\langle [L_x,L_y]\rangle|=\frac\hbar 2 |\langle L_z \rangle |=\frac12 \hbar^2 |m_z| $$

as you chose an s-state we have that ##\ell=0## and thus ##m_z=0## so there is no issue with ##\Delta L_x## or ##\Delta L_y## being as small as 0.
Just to point out that in individual cases, a vector ##\left|\psi\right.\rangle## can be a simultaneous eigenstate of non-commuting observables. If it's angular momentum in question, this can happen when eigenvalues are zero.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nugatory and pines-demon