2D Schroedinger eq. vs Bohr's model?

  • Thread starter Thread starter arivero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d Model
Click For Summary
Bohr's model struggles to accurately represent the square of angular momentum and repulsion angles for low quantum numbers (n). The discussion suggests that solving the hydrogen atom potential using a 2D Schrödinger equation may yield different results compared to Bohr's planar model. It is noted that the eigenvalues of angular momentum squared in various dimensions follow a specific formula. Quantum solutions for the 2D hydrogen atom reportedly show energy levels that depend on (n - 1/2) instead of n. The conversation highlights the need for further exploration of these concepts through referenced academic materials.
arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,481
Reaction score
187
For low values of n, Bohr's model fails to reproduce the value of the square of angular momentum, and the repulsion angles

But Bohr model is basically a planar model... so the question should be, if we solve the hydrogen atom potential in a 2D equation, is it still different? The eigenvalues of angular momentum squared, in generical dimensions, are as L(L+d-2), are they?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I seem to remember the quantum solutions to the 2-D hydrogen atom having energy levels that depend on (n - 1/2) rather than n.
 
Dr. Courtney said:
depend on (n - 1/2) rather than n.
Hmm I see. Probably related to Biederharn "Sommerfeld' puzzle"

Thanks for the references, going to read them.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K