2nd order correction to gauge transformation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the second-order correction to gauge transformations in the weak field approximation of general relativity. The transformation of the metric tensor is expressed as g_{\mu\nu}=\eta_{\mu\nu}+h_{\mu\nu}, with the new metric h'_{\mu\nu} incorporating higher-order terms from the coordinate transformation x^{\mu'}=x^{\mu}+\xi^{\mu}(x). Key references include sections 4.3 of Living Reviews in Relativity and 2.2 of an arXiv paper on astrophysics. The conversation highlights the complexity of higher-order terms and their relationship to Taylor series expansions, emphasizing the subtleties involved when using exact transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of weak field approximation in general relativity
  • Familiarity with metric tensors and their transformations
  • Knowledge of Taylor series expansions in mathematical physics
  • Basic concepts of Lie derivatives in differential geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the weak field approximation in general relativity
  • Explore the implications of higher-order terms in gauge transformations
  • Learn about the role of Killing vectors in coordinate transformations
  • Investigate the use of Lie derivatives in expressing transformations
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in general relativity, and researchers focusing on gauge theories and metric transformations.

matt91a
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
In the weak field approximation,

g_{\mu\nu}=\eta_{\mu\nu}+h_{\mu\nu}

If we make a coordinate transformation of the form

x^{\mu&#039;}=x^{\mu}+\xi^{\mu}(x)[\itex]<br /> <br /> it changes h_{\mu\nu}[\itex] to&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; h&amp;amp;#039;_{\mu\nu}=h_{\mu\nu}+\xi_{\mu,\nu}+\xi_{\nu,\mu}+O(\xi^{2})[\itex]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on what form the higher order terms take. I have an inkling it&amp;amp;#039;s terms from a taylor series expansion but I&amp;amp;#039;m not sure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for your reply but I'm afraid it doesn't shed any more light on it. I'm not sure if \xi^{\mu}(x)[\itex] being a Killing vector has anything to do with it.
 
The exact transformation is xμ = x'μ + ξμ. Applied to the metric this is

gμν = ∂xα/∂x'μ ∂xβ/∂x'ν gαβ

= (δαμ + ξα)(δβν + ξβ)(ηαβ + hαβ)

= ημν + (hμν + ξα hαν + ξβ hμβ + ξαξβhαβ)

= ημν + h'μν
 
A clear reference is http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9609040, although this is not that accessible to the beginner. One subtlety is that if you take the transformation x = x' + xi to be exact, then xi is no longer the generator of the diffeomorphism at higher than linear order. So most people use equation (1.1) of the above reference for the coordinate transformation. With that form you can express everything in terms of Lie derivatives, equation (1.3).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
916
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K