Derivation of Riemann tensor's first order-equation

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Riemann
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 2K views
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
TL;DR
Trying to derive Eq. (8.25) for Riemann tensor in the book of Schutz's in GR.
According to Schutz's second edition book, the equation for Riemann tensor to first order in ##h_{\mu\nu}## is:

$$R_{\alpha\beta\mu\nu}= \frac{1}{2}(h_{\alpha \nu,\beta \mu}+h_{\beta\mu,\alpha\nu}-h_{\alpha\mu,\beta \nu}-h_{\beta \nu , \alpha \mu})$$
which (as stated in the book) can be derived easily by using Eq. (8.12) which is:

$$g_{\alpha \beta}=\eta_{\alpha \beta}+h_{\alpha\beta}$$
All this is covered in pages 189-192.

How to derive the above identity? and how to derive the n-th order in ##h_{\mu\nu}## equation for Riemann tensor?
How come this equation is of first order in ##h_{\mu\nu}## if the terms in the above equation are second order derivatives of ##h##.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is first order in ##h## (and its derivatives), not in the order of the derivatives. The assumption is that ##h## and its derivatives are small and you ignore terms that are of higher order in ##h##. The derivation is just inserting your metric into the expression for the Christoffel symbols (keeping only terms linear in ##h##) and then inserting the expression for the Christoffel symbols into the expression for the curvature components in terms of the Christoffel symbols (again, keeping only terms linear in ##h##).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MathematicalPhysicist