MHB 307w.WLCA.C10 computations are linear?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Screenshot 2021-01-17 at 8.26.26 PM.png

the matrix at the bottom is from eMH but thot this was the way to do it... maybe not!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you understand what this table tells you and what you are asked to do?

Let x be the number of kg of raisins used, y the number of kg of peanuts, z the number of kg of chocolate. Then one batch of "Bulk" mix requires 7x+ 6y+ 2z, one batch of "standard' mix requires 6x+ 4y+ 5z, and one batch of "Fancy" mix requires 2x+5y+ 8z.

The bottom row shows the cost of each kg of raisins, peanuts, and chocolate. x kg of peanuts costs 255x, y kg of peanuts cost 4.65y, and z kg of chocolate cost 4.80z so one batch of "Bulk" mix cost 7(4.65y)+ 6(4.65y)+ 2(4.80z)
 
ok I think in LA notation $ x_1, x_2, x_3$ is preferred for the matrix

why do you have y twice in 7(4.65y)+ 6(4.65y)+ 2(4.80z)
 
That was a typo, of course.

It should be 7(2.55x)+ 6(4.65y)+ 2(4.80z).
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K