MHB 311.3.2.16 Find the determinant with variables a b c d e f g h i

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the determinant of a 3x3 matrix with variables a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, and i, specifically addressing the inclusion of a scalar factor of 5 in the last row. The correct determinant expression is derived, confirming that factoring out the scalar 5 results in multiplying the determinant by 5. Participants clarify that while row reduction can yield different forms, it does not preserve the determinant's value. Key properties of determinants, such as the effects of row swapping and adding multiples of rows, are also discussed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix determinants
  • Familiarity with row reduction techniques
  • Knowledge of properties of determinants
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of determinants in linear algebra
  • Learn about row reduction and its effects on determinants
  • Explore the concept of scalar multiplication in matrices
  • Investigate complex numbers in matrix theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, matrix theory, and determinants, will benefit from this discussion.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{311.3.2.16}$
Find the determinants where:
$\left|\begin{array}{rrr}a&b&c\\ d&e&f\\5g&5h&5i\end{array}\right|
=a\left|\begin{array}{rrr}e&f \\5h&5i\end{array}\right|
-b\left|\begin{array}{rrr}d&f \\5g&5i\end{array}\right|
+c\left|\begin{array}{rrr}d&e\\5g&5h\end{array}\right|=$

ok before I proceed on
just want see if this is correct
not sure why they thru the 5's in there
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is correct, though I don't like the use of the "i." (Complex numbers and all.)

If you want to get rid of the 5's:
[math]\left | \begin{matrix} a & b & c \\ d & e & f \\ 5g & 5h & 5i \end{matrix} \right | = 5 \left | \begin{matrix} a & b & c \\ d & e & f \\ g & h & i \end{matrix} \right | [/math]

-Dan
 
yeah, however I didn't know complex numbers were used in an matrix

$
a\left|\begin{array}{rrr}e&f \\5h&5i\end{array}\right|
-b\left|\begin{array}{rrr}d&f \\5g&5i\end{array}\right|
+c\left|\begin{array}{rrr}d&e\\5g&5h\end{array}\right|$
$=a(e5i-5hf)-b(d5i-5gf)+c(d5h-5ge)$
distirbute
$ae5i-a5hf-bd5i+b5gf+cd5d-c5ge$
rewrite
$5(aei-a5f-bdi+bgf+cdd-cge)$
hopefully,,, I quess the purpose of this was to show that 5 is a scaler
no book answer so not sure how to cross check this
 
thot I would throw in this question true or false

In some cases, a matrix may be row reduced to more than one matrix in reduced echelon form, using different sequences of row

ok but isn't there just one form of RREF possoble if can be derived? there are multiple ways to reduce it but only one outcome
 
First, any numbers, including complex numbers, can appear in a matrix.

Second, row reduction of a matrix does NOT preserve its determinant. For example, factoring a number out of an entire row (or column) divides the determinant by that number. That is why, when Topsquark factored the "5"out of the bottom row, he multiplied the determinant by 5.

Swapping two rows, multiplies the determinant by -1.

Finally, adding a multiple of one row to another does not change the determinant.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K