33kV 3phase fault causing transmission line entanglement

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around an incident involving a fault on a 33kV three-phase transmission line, believed to be induced by a flooded transformer connection box. Participants explore the nature of the fault current, the forces acting on the conductors, and the mechanics behind the twisting of the lines during the fault event. The conversation includes theoretical calculations, interpretations of electrical forces, and inquiries into similar experiences or evidence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a fault event where a flooded transformer connection box induced a fault on a 33kV transmission line, leading to twisting of the lines due to fault current.
  • Another participant questions the characterization of the forces involved, suggesting that it was not a repulsive force that caused the twisting of the lines.
  • Some participants discuss the nature of attractive and repulsive forces between conductors, with varying interpretations of how these forces operate under fault conditions.
  • There is mention of the role of synchronous generator sets in producing fault currents and their potential impact on conductor behavior during faults.
  • A participant references the historical use of the attractive force between conductors to define the ampere, indicating a foundational understanding of the forces at play.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of quick fault clearance and suggests that the twisting of wires indicates a failure to clear the fault promptly.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the calculations of induced forces and seek further clarification or evidence regarding the phenomenon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the forces acting on the conductors, with some arguing for attractive forces and others for repulsive forces. There is no consensus on the exact mechanics of the event or the calculations of induced forces, leaving the discussion unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various theoretical calculations and models, but there are limitations in the assumptions made and the specific conditions of the fault event. The discussion lacks definitive mathematical resolutions and relies on speculative reasoning.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in high voltage engineering, electrical fault analysis, and the behavior of transmission lines during fault conditions may find this discussion relevant.

jackdaniel66
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Good morning Gentlemen (and Ladies),

I'm looking for some help from you HV experts out there.

I have had an event where it is believed that a flooded transformer connection box induced a fault on to a 33kV 3phase transmission line, and the fault current was enough for the repulsive forces generated were enough to twist the 3 lines together.

The initial event was for 2 cycles (50hz) and did not cause protection to trip.

The fault current induces was capures on a trace and lasted 300mS, showing phases A & B initial contact and phase C approx 180mS into the event.

Criteria:
  • 33kV 3 phase no neutral
  • Fault current - measured at approx 10kA per phase
  • Initial fault - across all 3 phases 1.5 - 2 cycles
  • Secondary fault - approx 180mS between A & B and C joined in for a further 120mS before trip
  • Duration between fault 1 and 2 - 1.7 seconds
  • Conductors: approx 100 meters in length (over 2 spans - 1 centre pole - centre pole is around a bend and the line translates from horizontal to vertical to horizontal at this centre pole), 16mm steel core aluminium, ACB at each end.
  • Weather - Cold (12 deg C), Medium rain, Minimal wind
  • No other external influences in the lines can be discovered.

Now we have spent the last couple of days doing calcs based on every theory and formulae we can think of, and have results that range form induced forces of 30kg/m2 to over 1300N per linear meter.

My gut feeling says that this isn't enough force over a 300mS period to cause this to happen, but I need to prove it - one way or another

And none of us have ever heard of this type of event ever occurring in the real world (although we could find evidence of very heavy duty DC cables in an arc furnace snaking on the floor and having to be tied down).

So what I'm asking is:

Has anyone out there ever experienced this phenomenon?

Do you have any reports / evidence / pics / etc?

Can anyone provide a definite answer to the induced forces? And provde the maths behind it... :)

I can post pics if I can work out how, but I am happy to send to anyone who asks.

Thanks in advance.

Shane
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
OK, I take it from the astounding interest and the pure number of replies that;

Nobody knows - or they arent enough genuine propellerheads outthere with the math skills to work it out (which is good, because then I don't feel quite so stupid), or

Nobody cares (which makes this whole thing abit pointless...)
 
Obviously, it was not a "repulsive force" that twisted the lines together.

Do you know what is the attractive electric force between two lines (or the total electric force on anyone line) under normal operation?
 
Sorry to disagree, but an "attractive" force might have caused then to touch, it would not have caused 1 line to swing over the ther two and wrap around them.

And the field creates between 2 conductors, 50hz, 120Deg phase separation (3 phase) would be 2/3rds repulsive...
 
hmm, you may be right. If one line is at 10 kV, then the two other lines are at - 5 kV. I'd think in this situation the -5 kV lines would repulse from each other and attract to the 10 kV line. When, 0.005 s later, the first line becomes 0 V, the other two would be at around -8.66 kV and +8.66 kV, so then those lines might be attracting.
 
Last edited:
Don't know any maths for the attractive forces here... however if I had to guess I would say it's possible.. what kind of machines are supplying fault current? synch. generator sets cause low subtransient reactances (<5cycles of the fault) because of armature reaction, with such a low reactance its possible for fault currents (which are high...) to cause such an attraction... I'm really not sure...

Any sketches of the system on per unit or anything?

Is it possible an arc caused the bolted fault?
 
It's a freshman physics exercise to calculate the attractive force between two conductors carrying constant current in opposite directions - in fact didn't they at one time use that phenomenon to define the amp?
Anyhow alternating current alternates in all the lines so the forces probably continue to be attractive.

i can tell you that in our three phase switchgear the copper bus bar was stoutly braced for precisely the reason you cite - fault current tends to pull the conductors together. We had fast breakers that cleared in about one and a half cycles.
That your wires twisted together tells me something failed to clear the fault quickly.


So i guess I'm not really much help except moral support to say i think you're on the right track.

old jim
 
jim hardy said:
Anyhow alternating current alternates in all the lines so the forces probably continue to be attractive.

In ac regime we can say:
1-Induce forces always are atractive when phase difference between two faulted phase is zero.
2-Induce forces always are impulsive when phase difference between two faulted phase is 180 degree.
3-generally the average of time variable induce force is related to definite integral of F=K.i1.i2 and it may be attractive or impulsive regarding amount of phase difference, in 120 degree phase difference it is impulsive. Of course as you know in mechanical effects study the first impulse is very important, therefore everything will relate to instant of fault initiation.
 
related diagram
 

Attachments

  • ScientificPlotter_X over Y-1315219810210.jpg
    ScientificPlotter_X over Y-1315219810210.jpg
    11.7 KB · Views: 620

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
13K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
8K