3D space interface to other dimensions

  • Thread starter Thread starter snorkack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sci-fi
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores theories suggesting that space may have more than three dimensions, with some dimensions "rolled up." It uses the analogy of a blister on skin to illustrate how different dimensional spaces interact, highlighting how the edge of a blister represents a transition from 3D to 2D. The concept of black holes is mentioned, where the event horizon acts as a 2D surface marking the termination of 3+1D space. The conversation also considers how beings in lower dimensions perceive their surroundings and what happens when they encounter higher dimensions. Ultimately, the challenge lies in visualizing the openness and interconnectedness of higher-dimensional spaces without traditional edges.
snorkack
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
536
There are some theories which claim that space should for some mathematical reason have more than 3+1 dimensions, but that some of them are for some reasons "rolled up".
How would an interface look like where the number of unrolled dimensions changes?
Consider a blister on skin, or paint. The interior of the blister is a 3D region. Skin outside the blister is 2D. So the edge of the blister is a 1D line.
But the interior of the blister has actual bounding surfaces in the 3rd dimension. If on approaching the edge of 3D space, the 3rd dimension is "rolled up" rather than terminated at the ends, how would you see the difference?
The interior of black holes is said to have 3 dimensions instead of 4 (3+1), so event horizon is precisely a 2D surface where the 3+1D space terminates.
And how would a surface look like where 1 rolled-up space dimension unrolls? Looking from 3D space towards a region of 4D space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine it this way: a race of flat beings were living inside a two-dimensional picture. Even if the picture was extremely beautiful and eye-catching, they could only see the world around them; in their eyes, everything was simply line segments of various lengths and thicknesses. When one two-dimensional object is taken out of the picture into three-dimensional space would it see the entirety of the image if it just looks down.

Notable writer Cixin Liu described 4D like this:
Those who had never experienced 4D space might get the wrong impression that they were seeing everything "through" the hull (the characters are in a spaceship). But no, they were not seeing "through" anything. Everything was laid out in the open, just like when we look at a circle drawn on a piece of paper, we can see the inside of a circle without looking "through" anything. This kind of openness extended to every level, and the hardest part was describing how it applied to solid objects. One could see the interior of solids, such as the bulkheads or a piece of metal or a rock---one could see all the cross sections at once!
 
Your question is somewhat unclear, as there are no 'edges' to space in either the 3D model or the 3+n D model where n rolled up dimensions exist.
 
I'm currently writing a novel in which my main character was a victim of experimentation (cliche, I know) but has no memory of it. In the experimentation, technology was implanted in the character's body, allowing an AI algorithm to run off of the character and fuse it's psychological aspects with an actual human's. I'm not super knowledgeable in science such as this, and I'm sure doing this would be incredibly hard, if not impossible, to do. So for the sake of keeping the peace, let's just...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...
A map of a four-dimensional planet is three dimensional, so such can exist in our Universe. I made one and posted a video to the Internet. This is all based on William Kingdon Clifford's math from the 19th century. It works like this. A 4D planet has two perpendicular planes of rotation. The intersection of such a plane with the surface of the planet is a great circle. We can define latitude as the arctan( distance from one plane/distance from the other plane). The set of all points...

Similar threads

Back
Top